Orissa Court June 1988 Judgments
Tukuna Alias Satyajit Panda Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-28-1988
Reported in: 1989CriLJ364
G.B. Patnaik, J.1. The continued detention of detenu Tukuna alias Satyajit Panda pursuant to an order of detention passed by the District Magistrate, Cuttack, in exercise of his powers under Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') and approved by the State Government under Sub-section (4) of the said section is being assailed in this writ petition. The detaining authority on being satisfied that the detention of the detenu is necessary with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, has passed the impugned order of detention.2. The grounds of detention which were communicated to the detenu, as required under Section 8 of the Act, have been annexed as Ann-2 to the writ petition. It would be appropriate to extract the grounds of detention:2. On 28-12-1987 at 10 A.M. yourself and Sudhakar Bagedi went to the cattle feed shop of Biswanath Choudhury situated in front of Sura...
Tag this Judgment!Pratap Chandra Deb Vs. Agricultural Income-tax Officer and Others.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-23-1988
Reported in: [1988]174ITR462(Orissa)
This application arises out of a proceeding under the provisions of the Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act which was started long back in the year 1963-64 against the father of the petitioner for recovery of certain demands under the Agricultural Income-tax Act. On the death of the certificate-debtor, all his heirs and legal representatives including the present petitioner were substituted in his place. At that stage, the hearing as contemplated under section 9 of the Act. i.e., hearing and determining the objections filed under section 8 of the Act denying the liability or the like, had been over and the proceeding was at the stage of sale of the properties of the certificate-debtor.The petitioner has annexed the sale proclamation dated April 27, 1981 (annexure - 1), which obviously establishes the stage at which the petitioner had been added in the proceeding. He, however, came to this court, without filing any objection in the certificate court, with a prayer that the certificate pr...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›