Orissa Court May 1985 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Diptimayee Behera and anr. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-08-1985
Reported in: AIR1985Ori249; 60(1985)CLT331
R.C. Patnaik, J.1. The twopetitioners in O. J. C. No. 2050 of 1984 and the petitioner in O. J. C. No. 2034 of 1984 have filed these applications under Article 226 of the Constitution for a mandamus to theopposite parties to admit them to the M. B. B. S. course in any of the medical colleges of the State against the quota reserved for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes candidates.2. Prospectus for admission to the M. B. B. S. and B. D. S. courses in the Government Medical Colleges of Orissa was issued on April 26, 1984. Each college provided 107 seats. Besides, there were 20 seats for the B. D. S. course in the dental wing of the S. C. B. Medical College, Cuttack. In all, thus, there were 341 seats. 16 seats were reserved for Government of India nominees, three seats for the children of Armed Forces Personnel and three seats for the physically handicapped candidates of Orissa. Of the balance 319 seats, 8 per cent was reserved for Scheduled Castes and 12 per cent for the Sched...
Monahar Siwaram Jogal Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-08-1985
Reported in: 60(1985)CLT67; 1985(I)OLR586
R.C. Patnaik, J.1. The petitioner in this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure assails the order passed by the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Koraput, directing forfeiture of the bail bond furnished by him and issuance of non-bailable warrant of arrest. 2. The petitioner was released on bail in G. R. Case. No. 387 of 1984. The case was thereafter adjourned from time to time from 10.6.1984 awaiting submission of the final form. On 4.2.1985, the following order was passed: ' Put up today 3.2.85 was a Sunday. F. F. nor any report has been received from the I.O., Remind him to submit the same on or before 18.2.85. Accused persons are absent. No hazira today by the advocate. Issue N. B. W. against the accused persons. The bail bond furnished is cancelled. Put up on 18.2.85 for accused persons and F. F.'3. Mrs. A.K. Padhi, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that it was not necessary for the petitioner who was released on bail to appear until charg...
Jayasingh Madakami Vs. State
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-02-1985
Reported in: 1985(I)OLR627
B.K. Behera, J.1. The appellant stands convicted under Sec. 202 of the Indian Penal code ( for short, 'the Code') and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for his by the Court of Session after acceptance of the case of the prosecution, on the basis of the evidence of P. Ws. 1 to 3 about an extrajudicial confession said to have been made by the appellant and the recovery of an axe (M. O. I.) which, on chemical and serological test, had been found to have stains of human blood, from the place of concealment consequent upon a statement made by the appellant while in custody, that at midnight on October 12, 1983, the appellant had killed his brother-in-law (to be referred to hereinafter as 'the deceased') by means of M. O. I.2. We have heard the learned counsel for both the sides. It is not disputed that the deceased had died a homicidal death. Of the witnesses examined for the prosecution, P. W. 4, the widow of the deceased, had been examined to say that she had seen the actual assault on th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›