Orissa Court August 1984 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dambarudhar Bhunya Vs. Muralidhar Bhunya and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-03-1984
Reported in: AIR1986Ori15
K.P. Mohapatra, J.1. This revision is directed against the order dt. 27-11-80 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Kendrapara refusing the prayer of the petitioner to the effect that he is not liable to pay the costs of the suit decreed against him.2. The undisputed facts may be stated in brief. Opposite party 1 was plaintiff, the petitioner was defendant 1 and opposite parties 2, 3, and 4 were the other defendants in Title Suit No. 90 of 1968 of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Kendrapara. It was a suit for partition. The suit was decreed in favour of opposite party 1 with costs of Rs. 685.89 paise to be paid by the petitioner and opposite parties 2, 3 and 4 to opposite party 1. The petitioner preferred First Appeal No. 177 of 1971 in this Court The appeal was allowed in part and the parties were directed to bear their respective costs. Opposite party 1 levied execution in execution Case No. 85 of 1971 against the petitioner and opposite parties 2 to 4 for recovery of costs of ...
V. Krishnaveni Vs. V. Narasingha Rao and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-03-1984
Reported in: 1984(II)OLR838
K.P. Mohapatra, J.1. This revision is directed against the order passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Parlakhemundi on 15.12.1980 in M. J. C. No. 39 of 1979 refusing to execute an order dated 29.11.1972 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') passed in favour of the petitioner in Original Suit No. 1 of 1973 in which she prayed for a decree for judicial separation.2. The facts not disputed are stated in brief. The petitioner is the legally married wife of opposite party No. 1. She instituted Original Suit No. 1 of 1973 in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Parlakhemundi, praying for judicial separation under Section 10 of the Act on the grounds of cruelty and adultery between opposite parties Nos. land 2. During the pendency of the suit, she filed a petition under Sac. 24 of the Act registered as M. J. C, No. 46 of 1973 for pendents lite maintenance and expenses of the suit. By order dated 29. 11. 1972 the Court below granted pendentelite m...
Gobinda Nayak Vs. D. Mishra and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-01-1984
Reported in: 1984(II)OLR741
P.C. Misra, J.1. The petitioner in this writ application is the General Secretary of the Rengali Workers' Co-ordination Committee representing the entire working people of Rengali Dam Project and also other projects. He has prayed for issue of a writ of mandamus directing opposite party No. 1 to make immediate payment of the special construction allowance to each workman working in the Rengali Dam Project.2. The facts relevant for disposal of this writ application are as follows:--The construction work of the Rengali Dam Project began in the year 1972 and for the purpose, a large number of workers were employed in various sections of the project. It is not disputed that the establishment and its workmen came within the ambit of the Employees Provident Funds and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952 and the Scheme framed thereunder. The Employees' Provident Funds and Misc. Provisions Act, 1952 (for short the Act') and the Scheme were made applicable to the aforesaid establishment in November, 1980...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›