Orissa Court October 1976 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Weldcraft Orissa Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise a ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-19-1976
Reported in: 1979(4)ELT139(Ori)
R.N. Misra, J.1. Petitioner before us is a private limited Company registered under the Indian Companies Act of 1956 and engaged in manufacture of steel furniture which are excisable to duty at the rate of 20 per cent ad valorem. Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue and Insurance) by notification, dated 1st of April, 1971 (Annexre 3) provided exemption to the effect that the steel furniture up to the value not exceeding rupees one lakh cleared on or before the 1st day of April in any financial year by on bahalf of a manufacturer from one or more factories for some consumption would be exempted from excise duty, provided that the exemption would not be applicable to a manufacturer whose value of steel furniture cleared in the previous financial year had exceeded rupees two lakhs. Petitioner claimed exemption and approached the Assistant Collector of Central Excise at Cuttak for an appropriate order. The said authority heard the petitioner and by order da...
Rabinarayan Mohanty Vs. State of Orissa
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-15-1976
Reported in: (1977)IILLJ132Ori
R.N. Misra, J.1. This is an application for a writ of cerniorary to quash the punishment impose in a disciplinary proceeding against the petitioner.2. Petitioner was serving as a Grade I Assistant in the Planning and Co ordination Department of the State Government when in 1971, a set of charges were named against him on the score that he had made a misrepresentation and suppressed facts; he had made false entries in Government documents which amounted to misconduct and he was negligent in ins duty. Similar charges had been communicated to him in three stages, but he had ultimately been punished with reference to one set of charges Petitioner asked for certain documents before furnishing his explanation against the charges and claims that in the absence of the documents he was obliged to submit his explanation. The enquiry was not made in accordance with the Rules and natural justice and ultimately he has been debarred from drawing any increment in the scale of pay for five years with ...
Md. AftabuddIn Khan and ors. Vs. Smt. Chandan Bilasini and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-11-1976
Reported in: AIR1977Ori69
R.N. Misra, J.1. There lived one Kalikrishna Sarkar in the town of Cuttack owning substantial properties. He died immediately after executing a Will on 11-12-1905 (Ext 11) in terms whereof some of his assets were given to his mother add other relatives, some to the family deity Sri Radha Binoda Jew and the rest of the properties were meant to go to his wife Chandan Bilasini (plaintiff No. 1). Five executors appointed under the Will were to manage the properties and after meeting the expenses of administration were required to pay the mesne profits to her. The testament absolutely put restriction on alienations by the wife but authorised her to take a son in adoption and in case the first adopted son died, to take another with the approval of the executors. The Will was probated in a proceeding of 1906 and while the executors were in management of the estate of the deceased, plaintiff No. 1 adopted one Sudhansu Mohan Sarkar. The adoptive mother and, the adopted son did not pull on well ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›