Orissa Court October 1972 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sk. Akbar Ali and anr. Vs. Sk. Lokman and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-03-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Ori129; 38(1972)CLT1301
ORDERS. Acharya, J.1. Defendant Nos. 2 and 2 (Ka) have filed this revision petition against the order of the court below allowing the application of Sk. Lokman, opposite party No. 1, to be impleaded as the legal representative of deceased Amina Bibi, instead of the petitioners.2. The petitioners, defendant Nos. 2 and 2 (ka) were allowed to be substituted as the legal representatives of deceased Amina Bibi, the original defendant No. 2 in the suit bv the trial Court's order dated 26-6-1964. Thereafter, Sk. Lokman, opposite party No. 1, filed petition to be substituted as the legal representative of the above-named Amina Bibi in place of the present petitioner. That petition was rejected by the Court below on 15-11-1966. Thereafter Sk. Lokman preferred Civil Revision No. 19 of 1967 in this court. This Court allowed the said revision petition and set aside the order passed by the court below and remanded the case back to the trial court for disposal in accordance with law with a direction...
Silla Laxminarayana Vs. Arjuna Gaudo
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-03-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Ori134
R.N. Misra, J.1. This is a plaintiff's appeal against the decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge at Bhubaneswar allowing his claim in part in a suit for recovery of money.2. The plaintiff came to Court on the allegation that the defendant was an employee under the firm 'Silla Rammamurty & Sons' of which he happens to be the managing partner. The defendant was posted at Balugaon branch of the firm from 1951, initially as accountant and later as manager. The defendant used to draw advances from the firm and his salary as and when due was being adjusted against such advances. The defendant stopped work from 24th of July, 1964. By then he had over-drawn to the extent of Rs. 6,496.97. The plaintiff asked for recovery of that amount along with damages at six per cent in all Rupees 7,190/-.3. The defendant did not enter contest. In fact no written statement even was filed. An employee of the firm was examined as P. W. 1 on behalf of the firm.4. The learned Subordinate Judge found that...
Haladhar Panda Vs. Nisakar Naik and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-03-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Ori132; 38(1972)CLT1315
R.N. Misra, J.1. This is an application for a writ of certiorari to auash the election of the opposite party No. 1 as the Chairman of the Hatadihi Panchayat Samiti.2. According to the petitioner the opP. party No. 1 was elected as Chairman of the said Samiti in 1961 and continued to hold that office upto 1967. That constituted the first term of Chairmanship of opposite party No. 1. In 1968. election took place for the said office. The opposite party No. 1, was again elected and was to continue in office upto 1971. That was his second term. On 15th of December, 1970, he resigned. On 10th of January. 1971, election took place and opposite party No. 1 was again elected. This was his third term. It is conceded that these terms are consecutive.3. Under Section 16 (3) (a) of the Orissa Panchayat Samiti Act of 1959 (Act 7 of 1960) no person is eligible to be the Chairman of a Samiti for more than two consecutive terms. In the case of Madan Mohan Pani v. State of Orissa. AIR 1971 Orissa 283, t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›