Skip to content

Orissa Court October 1968 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 08 1968

Madan Naikani Vs. Ranjit Mahakur and ors.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Oct-08-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Ori77; 35(1969)CLT46

ORDERG.K. Misra, J.1. Deceased Gangadhar, father of defendant No. 3, and Dibakar (defendant No. 1) were brothers. Plaintiff No. 1 purchased the A schedule lands for Rs. 400 and plaintiff No. 2 purchased the B schedule lands for Ks. 500 by two registered sale deeds on 30-12-64 from defendant No. 3. The case of the plaintiffs is that Gangadhar died in a separated status from defendant No. 1 and after his death his sole heir defendant No. 3 was in possession of the property. They accordingly prayed for declaration of their title and eviction of defendants 1 and 2 who were interfering with their possession. In the alternative there was a prayer that a decree for refund of consideration of Rs. 900 with interest is to be passed against defendant No. 3.Defendant No. 3 filed written statement fully supporting the case of the plaintifts. Defendants 1 and 2 contested the suit alleging that Gangadhar died in a joint status with defendant No. 1 and the entire joint family property devolved on defe...


Oct 08 1968

Rinkula Raito Vs. State

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Oct-08-1968

Reported in: 1969CriLJ703

G.K. Misra, J.1. The appellant has been-convicted under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life. On 24.3.65 at about 8 P.M. there was a quarrel between the appellant and the deceased. The appellant challenged the deceased as having taken away his liquor. The deceased denied the fact and gave some slaps to the appellant. The appellant in his turn slapped the deceased. P.Ws. 7 and 9 intervened and both the appellant and the deceased left for their houses. Thereafter the appellant returned back with a Pahurani (M.O.I.), came near the house of the deceased and challenged him to come out. When the deceased came out, the appellant gave him a stroke on the head. The deceased sat down. The appellant gave a second stroke as a result of which the deceased fell down. The appellant left the place leaving behind M.O.I.P.W. 7 carried the deceased home. The-deceased died on 27.3.65 in the hospital at R. Udayagiri. His dying declaration (Ext. 2) was taken by the Magistrate (P.W. 2) i...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial