Skip to content

Orissa Court April 1956 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 26 1956

Laxmi Narasingha Swami Mahapravu and anr. Vs. Patta Sahuani and ors.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Apr-26-1956

Reported in: AIR1957Ori86

P.V.B. Rao, J.1. The appellant is the Collector of Ganjam who was appointed Receiver in Title Suit No. 44 of 1948 which was a suit for succession to the Mahantship of Haradakhandi Muth. He filed the appeal as representing the Haradakhandi Muth. The first respondent who is the plaintiff is the widow of one Binayak Sahu in whose favour the 2nd respondent who is the plaintiff is the widow of one Bina Baikoli Panigrahi, defendant 5 in the case, as agent and power-of-attorney holder of the previous Mahant of Haradakhandi Muth, Sri Ramanarayan Das Goswami executed a promissory note for Rs. 1600/- as agent of the Mahant of the Muth.The third respondent Sri Maithili Priya Das Goswami who is defendant 2 in the case is the successful claimant in Title Suit No. 44 of 1948 to succeed Mahant Ramanarayan Das Goswami and the fourth respondent was added as defendant 3 as he was one of the curators appointed by the District Judge with regard to the Haradakhandi Muth.2. The plaintiff filed a suit on the...


Apr 24 1956

Ghanashyam Das and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Apr-24-1956

Reported in: AIR1956Ori194; 22(1956)CLT375; 1956CriLJ1334

Narasimham, C.J.1. This is a petition for quashing a criminal case (C, C. No. 5 of 1955/T-64 of 1955) pending in the Court of the Subdivisional Magistrate, Balasore, against the three petitioners. Petitioners 1 and 2 were said to be the Managing Directors of a firm known as the Orissa Steel Corporation, with its office at Soro in the district of Balasore. Petitioner 3 was the Manager of the said firm. The prosecution case against the mwas that sometime in 1950 they, on their application, were allotted quotas of iron and steel by the Central Government in pursuance of Clause 4, Iron and Steel (Control of Production and Distribution) Order, 1941 (hereinafter referred to as the Central Order) for the purpose of using the same for fabricating finished goods at their factory at Soro.Subsequently in 1951 when the Orissa Iron and Steel Products (Control of Prices and Distribution) Order 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Orissa Order) came into force in the State of Orissa, they were also g...


Apr 09 1956

In Re: Orissa Jute and Cotton Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Apr-09-1956

Reported in: 22(1956)CLT231

Rao, J. 1. This is an application under Section 281, Indian Companies Act of 1913 corresponding to Section 633 of the new Companies Act, that is, Act I of 1956, which has come into force on 1-4-56. 2. The petitioners are : the Orissa Jute and Cotton Mills Ltd., a company incorporated in the state of Orissa with its registered office at Cantonment Road, Cuttack and Messrs. Madanla Jajodia, So hanlal Jajodia, Bhagabatl Prasad Khaitan and Radhakrishna Bala as its directors. 3. The Orissa Jute and Cotton Mills limited Company was incorporated under the Indian Companies Act on 27-11-46 and a certificate for commencement of business was issued in its favour on 19-8-49. The registered office of the company which was originally situated at Bakharabad was shifted to 14, Cantonment Road, Cuttack, and it was duly intimated to the Registrar, Joint Stock Companies on 4-10-49. Sri Madanlal was in charge of the management of the assets of the company, but the accountant of the company who was in char...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial