Orissa Court September 1954 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Damodar Mohanty Vs. Utkal University
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-06-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Ori151
Narasimham, J.1. This is an application for appropriate reliefs under Article 226 of the Constitution by a student of the Madhusudan Law College of the Utkal University who had appeared in the LL.B. Examination, Law Part I, held in June, 1952 and was declared to be unsuccessful. The marks obtained by him in the various subjects of that examination are as follows:PaperSubjectMarks awardedMaximum Marks.ILaw of Crimes and Criminal Procedure.46100IIHindu Law.60100IIIContract and torts.60100IVConstitutional Law of England and India and Evidence.59100VRoman Law and International Law.29100VIJurisprudence.55100 Total ...309600It appears that for passing the examination a candidate should secure at least 33 1/3 per cent, marks in every paper. The petitioner had passed in all the Papers except Paper V.On 8-9-1952, he submitted a representation to the Vice-chancellor of the Utkal University stating that in Paper V the subject for the course of study prescribed by the Academic Council was 'Interna...
Mangal Chandra Dan Vs. the State
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Sep-06-1954
Reported in: AIR1954Ori251; 20(1954)CLT558
Narasimhm, J. 1. This is an appeal from the judgment of the Sessions Judge of Koraput-Jeypore convicting the appellant under Sections 409 and 467/471, I. P.C., and sentencing him to various terms of imprisonment and fine.2. The appellant was a temporary postman attached to Jeypore post office during April and May, 1952. It was alleged that during that period he received three money-orders payable to three different persons named Bansulia Dombru, Guru Mohuria and Ratni Ghasiani and that he committed criminal breach of trust of the amounts covered by the three money-orders and either forged the thumb-impressions of the payees on the money orders forms or used those money-order forms as genuine knowing them to contain forged thumb impressions.The full particulars of the money-orders are given below:Money-order No.Name of payee.Date of entrustment with the appellant.Alleged date of payment2419Bansolia Dambaru28-4-521-5-523675Ratani Ghasiani26-5-5229-5-523674Guru Mahuria26-5-5229-5-52The le...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›