Orissa Court October 1954 Judgments
Panchanan Das Vs. Province of Orissa Through the Dist. Magistrate and ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-28-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Ori57; 21(1955)CLT389
Mohapatra, J. 1. The unsuccessful plaintiff in both the Courts below has brought this second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 15-3-1950, of Sri G.R. Rao, Addl. Subordinate Judge of Balasore, arising out of a suit brought by. the plaintiff for recovery of compensation of Rs. 3620/12/- in the following circumstances : Defendant No. 1 is the Province of Orissa and defendants 2 to 6 are the members of the Food Distribution Committee. On 11-7-1943, the District Magistrate of Balasore requisitioned, under Rule 75A of the Defence of India Rules, 15 bags of rice and the entire quantity of paddy found in the four granaries belonging to the appellant. Defendants 2 to 6 were directed by the District Magistrate to dispose of the paddy at Rs. 8/-per maund and pay the sale-proceeds to the appellant. The paddy was actually seized on 11-7-1943 and kept under lock and key. The appellant having executed a zimanama the stock was kept in his custody. 3rd and 4th of October, 1943, were the date...
Tag this Judgment!Ridhikaran RamadhIn Vs. French Motor Car Company Ltd. and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-19-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Ori60; 21(1955)CLT322
Rao, J. 1. This Second Appeal by the plaintiff is against the reversing judgment of the Subordinate Judge of Berhampur dismissing the suit against the first defendant in the appeal by it against the judgment of the District Munsif, Berhampur, decreeing the suit against all the three defendants. 2. The first defendant is the French Motor Car Company Ltd., which carries on some business in Calcutta in motor cars, spare parts and accessories. The Second defendant, the Ganjam Automobiles Ltd., is a firm dealing in motor cars, etc., in Vizianagram and is represented by the third defendant. The plaintiff is a firm at Berhampur under the name and style of Messrs. Ridhikaran Ramadin. 3. The plaintiff's case is that the third defendant who is the agent of the first defendant Company carries on some business under the name and style of the Ganjam Automobiles Ltd., that he approached the plaintiff at Berhampur and booked an order as agent of the first defendant on 21-6-57 agreeing to supply one B...
Tag this Judgment!Balkrishna Praharaj and ors. Vs. Priya Nath Praharaj and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Oct-19-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Ori149; 21(1955)CLT82
Mohapatra, J.1. This first appeal against the judgment dated 16-12-1948 of Sri K. K. Bose, and Addl. Subordinate Judge of Cuttack, arises out of a suit for partition-defendants 1 to 4 being the appellants.It will be necessary to reproduce the genealogy herein below in order to appreciate the respective cases of different sets of parties in the suit for partition; MADHAB PRAHARAJ | ----------------------------------------------------- | | | | | Nandakishore Ganeswar Nabakishore Shymasundar Purna chandra | | =Manikya | | | Priyanath Dibya Srinihas Mukta Dibya | (Plff.) | (D.5) (D.6) | | --------------------------------------------------- Ambika Devi | | | |Balakrishna (D.1) Gadadhar (D.2) Adikanda (D.3) Prasanta (D.4)2. Madhab had 5 sons, Nandakishore, Ganeswar, Nabakishore, Shyamsundar and Purnachandra. Defendants 1 to 4 are the sons of Nandakishore. Plaintiff is the son of Gancswar. Defendant 23 is the daughter of Nabakishore who died without a sun. Defendant 5 is the son of Shyamasund...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›