Mumbai Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shaikh Sabir Lad Mohammad Vs. The Commissioner, Ahmednagar Municipal C ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Jun-08-2015
Oral Judgment: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by the consent of the parties and heard finally. 2. The petitioner takes exception to the judgment and award of the Labour Court dated 01/04/2010 delivered in Reference I.D.A.No.39/2004. The reference has been rejected and the prayer of the petitioner seeking reinstatement with continuity and back wages, has been turned down. 3. The contentions of Mr.Shahane, learned Advocate can be summarized in brief as follows: (a) The petitioner was working with the respondent/Corporation from 01/07/1989 till his oral termination dated 19/05/1990. (b) The petitioner has worked in continuous and uninterrupted service of the respondent / Municipal Corporation thereby entitling himself to the benefits and protection of Section 25B, 25F and 25G of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. (Hereinafter referred to as the Act). (c) Juniors have been retained in employment in the face of the oral termination of the petitioner. (d) The law and procedure laid ...
Marotrao Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Departme ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jun-08-2015
Oral Judgment: (B.R. Gavai, J.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The appeal challenges the order passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 12th of June, 2002 in Writ Petition No.1998/2002 thereby dismissing the petition which is filed by the petitioner. 3. The facts in brief give rise to filing of the present petition are as under:- That, the respondent no.3-Bank is a specified Co-operative Society, as provided under Section 73G of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act?). By a Resolution dated 14th August, 2001 the amendment was approved in the Annual General Meeting of the said bank. As per the said Resolution, the number of Directors which was originally 15 was sought to be increased to 17 as required under the provisions of Section 13 of the said Act. The Competent Authority i.e. respondent no.2 was moved for grant of approval to the amendment of the said bye-laws. The respondent no.2 vide hi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›