Mumbai Court August 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Carlos Tavora Vs. M/s. Boshan Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
Oral Judgment: 1. Heard rival submissions at length on this writ petition preferred by the petitioner-original defendant challenging the judgment and order dated 05.03.2009 of the District Judge-1, North Goa, Panaji in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 137/2008. The said appeal preferred by the present writ petitioner-defendant was rejected and the earlier order passed by the learned Civil Judge Junior Division, Mapusa in Regular Civil Suit No. 208/2005/D dated 18.11.2008 was confirmed. The said order dated 18.11.2008 was passed on the application of the present respondent-original plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Code in the said suit asking for further clarification and for variation of injunction in the order earlier granted on 18.05.2006. 2. The facts of the case are rather peculiar in nature and apparently an example as to how the parties do not obey the order of the Court still when it is a question of touching safety of the persons residing in the neighbourhoo...
Kabulsing Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
V.M. Deshpande, J. 1] The present Revision discloses a sordid tale of young woman along with her two minor children who were required to cut short their lives, due to atrocities committed on her by the present applicant. Munawar Khan (PW 1) at the relevant time was a police patil of village Macchindra Pardi. On 24.1.1989 he was coming from Tanda and going to his village. A well is situated in the agricultural field bearing Survey No. 126. When he went near the said well, he saw two dead bodies of children floating inside the well. Since he was not knowing the said children, he gave call to other boys from the village, who disclosed to him that those were the children of daughter of one Nanusing, resident of his village Macchindra Pardi. Accordingly, he gave a report to the police station. The said report is at Exh.13. In pursuance of the said report, police officer came on the spot. The police officer was taken near the well by Munawar Khan. 2] Gopinath Sarode (PW 8) was working as Pol...
The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department Vs. Sudhakar Naryanrao ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
1. Heard the submissions at the Bar. 2. The petitioner has challenged the Award dt.14.8.2003 passed by the First Labour Court Nagpur in Reference I.D.A. Case No. 143 of 1998. Reference was made as to whether the petitioner had terminated the services of the respondent/employee namely Sudhakar Narayanrao Mendhe illegally with effect from 20.5.1989 and by adopting unfair labour practices. It was answered in the affirmative and the Labour Court has directed reinstatement of the respondent to the former post with continuity of service with effect from 20.8.1989. 3. The case of the respondent was that he was employed as a 'Majdoor' with effect from 21.4.1987 at Wardha in Sub-Division No.1 in the building and road works under the supervision of Sub-Division no.1 at the monthly salary of Rs. 407/- on the monthly nominal muster rolls during the hours of 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily and has worked for continuously more than 240 days in each year of the completed service. The respondent claimed that h...
Solapur University Vs. Radhika Nadhukar Yele and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
P.C.: 1. These batch of Writ Petitions arise out of a common order dated 10.1.2012 passed by the Learned Presiding Officer, College Tribunal Mumbai. The learned counsel for the parties agree that common questions of fact and law arise in all these Petitions and that the petitions can be disposed of by this common Judgment. 2. Rule returnable forthwith. By consent of the learned counsel for the parties and at their request taken up for final hearing. 3. By these Petitions filed under article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner-Solapur University challenges the common Judgment and Order dated 1st November, 2012 passed by the Learned Presiding Officer, University and College Tribunal Solapur University (for short the Tribunal). By the impugned orders the Tribunal has allowed the appeals preferred by the Respondent No. 1 in each of these Petitions. (for short the Respondents). The Tribunal has quashed and set aside the order dated 10th January, 2012 issued by the Petiti...
State of Goa and Another Vs. Ramchandra Bhaskar Suria
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
Oral Judgment: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. This common judgment shall dispose of all the aforesaid appeals since they pertain to the lands acquired under the same notification. 3. First Appeal No.27/2002 and First Appeal No.139/2002 are directed against the judgment and award dated 30/08/2001 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Panaji (Reference Court, for short) in Land Acquisition Case No.1/2000. First Appeal No.27/2002 has been filed by the respondents in the Land Acquisition Case No.1/2000 whereas First Appeal No.139/2002 has been filed by the applicant therein. First Appeal No.177/2006 arises out of the judgment and award dated 20/02/2006 passed by the learned District Judge, North Goa (Reference Court, for short) in Land Acquisition Case No.57/2006. First Appeal No.179/2006 has been filed against the judgment and award dated 20/02/2006 passed by the learned District Judge, North Goa (Reference Court, for short) in Land Acquisition Case...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›