Mumbai Court October 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anand Prabhakar Joshi Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-2014
P.D. Kode, J. 1. By this petition, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No.40 of 2000 of the Court of Civil Judge(S.D.), Pune has prayed for (i) Setting aside the administrative order dated 6th January, 2012 of Hon'ble Chief Justice, Bombay High Court. (ii) Directing the Disciplinary Committee to take decision on his complaint as per rule of law preferably within 30 days period as High Court itself is disciplinary authority. (iii) In event of sanctioning authority according sanction, permitting the petitioner to prosecute respondent No.4 along with Respondent No.2 as per Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. (iv) Passing any other or further order or orders as deem fit and proper by the Court in the interest of Justice. 2. The petitioner in person urged that he is forced to approach this Court as his request for according sanction under Section 197 of Code of Criminal Procedure to prosecute respondent No.2-Pr...
Kokila Gujrya Padvi and Another Vs. The president, Adivasi Satpuda Shi ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Oct-01-2014
Oral Judgment : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties and heard finally. 2. Both these petitions are being taken up together for hearing since the respondent/employer is the same, dates of termination is the same and the services rendered are also on identical position. The issue involved is also common in both the matters. 3. Learned Advocate for the petitioners has submitted the facts of the case in brief as follows : (a) The date of birth of the petitioner Kokila in the First petition is 05/10/1949. (b) Her termination is by letter dated 17/12/2009 w.e.f. 21/12/2009. (c) She was working as a Hostel Superintendent with the respondents. (d) In the second petition, the petitioner Divlya @ Dinkar is born on 08/01/1950. (e) His termination is also by letter dated 17/12/2009 w.e.f. 21/12/2009. (f) The Zilla Parishad hostels are operated by respondent No.1 Trust. (g) Divlya was appointed as a Superintendent. (h) Respondent No.1 operates the hostel in a tribal ar...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›