Mumbai Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagdish Bansu Kharwal Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
Oral Judgment: (Mrs. Bhatkar, J.) 1. The appellant is convicted for the offence of murder punishable u/s 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and fine. He is also convicted for the offence punishable u/s 201 of the Indian Penal Code and suffer RI for 2 years and fine. 2. The incident of murder of one Sayyed Irfan Ul Huda had taken place on 16.12.2004. It is the case of the prosecution that the deceased Sayyed was residing alongwith his brothers including the complainant Sayyed Masud Alam (PW1) at Maulana Azad Nagar, Nashik. All the brothers were running a shop viz., M/s.Sunrise Scrap Traders doing the business of scrap material. The appellant was also in the same business. He was residing as a tenant in room No.1 on the upper floor of one Gaurav bungalow owned by the husband of PW10 Minakshi Kale at Shivaji Nagar, Nashik. On 16.11.2004, at around 10 to 10.15am, he was seen by PW10 Minakshi alongwith the deceased. Then she saw him at 3pm to 3.15 pm ...
Santosh Hanmant Gavandi Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
Oral Judgment: (Mrs. Tahilramani, J.) This Appeal has been preferred by the appellant original accused against the judgment and order dated 9.12.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.277 of 2008. By the said judgment and order, the learned Sessions Judge convicted the appellant u/s 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced the appellant to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/-, i/d RI for 7 days. 2. The prosecution case briefly stated is as under: The marriage of appellant with PW1 Kirti took place in the year 2000. They had three daughters, namely, Anjali aged about 6 years, Manjali aged about 6 years and Aarti aged about 1.1/2 years at the time of the incident. The appellant alongwith his wife and children was residing at Sanjaynagar Zopadpatti in Akkalkot, District Solapur. Till Kirti gave birth to the 2nd daughter, her marital life was going on smoothly and happily. However, when she gave birth to third daughter, the appellant got an...
V.S. Anandan Vs. Union of India (Narcotics Control Bureau, Mumbai) and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-01-2013
1 The appellant herein is the original accused in NDPS Special Case No. 108 of 2006. The accused is convicted for offence punishable under Section 21(b) r/w 8(c) and 29 r/w 8(c) and 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the N.D.P.S. Act') and is sentenced to suffer R.I. for 5 years and to pay fine of Rs. 50,000/- i.d. to suffer S.I. for 3 months vide Judgment and Order dated 28th March, 2012 by Special Judge under the N.D.P.S. Act. 2 Such of the facts, which are necessary for the decision of this appeal are as follows: (i) The complainant Mr. Canute Menezes was working as Intelligence Officer in the Narcotics Control Bureau(NCB), Mumbai. On 25/2/2006 he received an information that a person by name V.S. Anandan (present appellant) is travelling from Ratlam to Mumbai in sleeper coach No. S8 berth No. 59 of Awadh Express which is expected to arrive at Boriwali Station in the early hours of 26/2/2006. The informant had also given th...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›