Mumbai Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Kailash Hariram Dargad and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra Throug ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Dec-04-2012
Oral Judgment: Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties taken up for final hearing. 2. The order passed under Sub-Sec. 3 of Sec. 20 of the Pre-conception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act 2003 (hereinafter referred as to the P.C.P.N.D.T. Act for the sake of brevity) is assailed. 3. The registration of the petitioners sonography centre is suspended vide order dated 10th June, 2012. The said order is passed without issuing show cause notice to the petitioner. 4. Mr. Bora, the learned counsel for the petitioners' submits that only technical infirmities are noticed by the inspecting authorities. There is no avernment made in the order about the petitioners being engaged in performance of any acts prohibited by the P.C.P.N.D.T. Act. According to the learned counsel Sub-Section 1 and 2 of Sec. 20 of the P.C.P.N.D.T. Act requires show cause notice to be given, so also hearing is contemplated before suspending registration. In the present...
Dalpatsiha Ganeshsiha Rajput Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
A.R. Joshi, J. 1. Heard rival arguments on this Criminal Appeal preferred by the appellant/orig.accused challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated 9th August, 2004 passed by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No.19 of 2004. By the said judgment and order, the appellant/accused was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC and was sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.500/-, in default to suffer further RI for two months. He was acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. 2. The case of the prosecution, in nutshell, is as under:- The appellant/accused was working in one hotel by name Hotel Panchavati Yatri at Nashik as a waiter. He left the job on 6th October, 2003. The victim woman Pushpa Jadhav was also working in the same hotel as a maid servant. As such, she was in acquaintance with the appellant/accused as both were working in the same hotel as servants. Thou...
Mohamad Siddiki Haji Moha Shafi @ Ansari Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
S.S. Shinde, J. This Writ Petition takes an exception to the order dated 17th August, 2012 passed by the Principal Secretary (Special), Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai in Appeal No.Ext.112 of 2012 as well as order dated 22nd March, 2012 passed by the Respondent No.2, i.e. the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Region-2, Bhiwandi, District : Thane, in Case No.Externment/SR/97/2012, thereby externing the Petitioner from Thane District for a period of one year under Section 56(b) of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. 2. It is the case of the Petitioner that from last several years he is working for Republican Party of India. It is the case of the Petitioner that the Respondent No.4 by Report dated 8th August, 2011 informed the Respondent No.2 herein that, the movements and acts of the Petitioner are causing harm to the Society and the Petitioner has committed the offence under Chapters XVI and XVII of the Indian Penal Code. On the basis of the said Report, the Respondent No.4 has requested the ...
The Maharashtra Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary Vs. T ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
R.M.Borde, J. 1 Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties. 2 The petitioner Maharashtra Public Service Commission is taking exception to the decision rendered by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Bench at Aurangabad, in Original Application No.769/2011, decided on 13.12.2011. The Tribunal, while allowing the Original Application tendered by Respondent No.1 herein, granted a declaration that Respondent No. 1 has achieved the benchmark for general category prescribed by the Commission for holding him eligible to appear for the interview. 3 The Maharashtra Public Service Commission undertook selection process for filling up 74 vacancies of the post of Education Officer in State services. The Commission conducted screening test of the candidates and results were declared on 17.07.2011. The Commission published first answer key soliciting objections from the candidates and after receiving objections and on considerati...
Abdul Wahid S/O. Abdul Majid Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Dec-03-2012
1. The petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India and under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code for the relief of quashing of criminal proceeding bearing R.C.C. No. 192/2004, which is pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Kannad, District Aurangabad. Both sides are heard. Copy of the charge-sheet and copies of papers of investigation are produced and this Court has perused the record. 2. The charge-sheet, papers of investigation and the contentions made in the petition show that case is filed against the petitioner for offences committed of creating false record and of cheating for obtaining certificate from authority that the petitioner belongs to Momin caste, O.B.C. The Executive Magistrate, the authority, issued certificate in 1991. By using this certificate, the petitioner contested the election of Local Body and got elected from O.B.C. category. The caste certificate was referred to Caste Scrutiny Committed. The Committee invalidated the cl...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›