Mumbai Court August 2009 Judgments

iliyas Amir Maniyar Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(6)BomCR138

Gavai B.R., J.1. By way of present petition, the petitioner challenges the virus of Rule 2-A(a)(iv) of Rules which are called as Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayat (President Election) Rules, 1981.2. Shri Bhandari learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, by the said Rules a reservation is provided for women belonging to general category, so also a women from reserved category like the Scheduled Caste, the Scheduled Tribes, O.B.C., etc. Shri Bhandari further submits that a women form a class apart and further classification of reserved category i.e. women belonging to the Scheduled Caste, woman belonging to the Scheduled Tribe and women belonging to O.B.C. is not permissible under the constitutional scheme. Relying on provisions of Article 15(3) and 15(4), it is submitted that, reservation is provided under Article 15(3) of Constitution of India to women. So far as other reserved categories are concerned it is provided under Article 15(4) of the Constituti...

Sou.Sarasvati Arun Shegur and Another Vs. Vikas Co-op. Bank Ltd., Head ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Oral Order:- Per Shri P.N. Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member We heard Mr. P.D. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioners. Revision Petitioners want to withdraw this Revision Petition since grievance has been met by the respondents. Revision Petitioners therefore do not want to prosecute this Revision Petition. As such, we pass the following order :- Order: 1. Revision Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 2. No order as to costs. 3. Misc. Appl. Nos.542(A)/2009, 543(A)/2009 stands disposed of. 4. Copies of the order be furnished to the parties....

Managing Director M/S. Suman Motels Ltd., Vadgadi, Mumbai Vs. Mr. Rame ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Oral Order:- Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member This appeal arises out of order/award dated 27/03/2008 passed in consumer complaint No.286/2006 Mr.Ramesh Ganpat Taikar V/s. Surendra M. Khandar, Managing Director, M/s.Suman Motels Ltd. passed by South Mumbai District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (Forum below in short). It was a consumer complaint referring to non-refund of deposit amounts. The impugned award was passed ex-parte. Paragraph 3 of the impugned order refers to as to why the matter proceeded ex-parte. It is revealed that the notice of the proceedings was given and it was served on the appellant. Subsequently, there is another application to condone delay in filing complaint was filed, but no notice thereof appears to have been given to the appellant. Ex-parte order passed, therefore, suffers from illegality since there is a breach of basic principle of natural justice. There is some delay in filing this appeal. This application for condonation of de...

Sou.Padmavati Anand Shegur and Another Vs. Vikas Co-op. Bank Ltd., Sol ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Oral Order:- Per Shri P.N. Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member We heard Mr. P.D. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioners. Revision Petitioners want to withdraw this Revision Petition since grievance has been met by the respondents. Revision Petitioners therefore do not want to prosecute this Revision Petition. As such, we pass the following order:- Order: 1. Revision Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 2. No order as to costs. 3. Misc. Appl. Nos.546(A)/2009, 545(A)/2009 stands disposed of. 4. Copies of the order be furnished to the parties....

Shri Swapnil Bandu Kadam Vs. the Principal Indira Gandhi Engineering C ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Honble Presiding Judicial Member This appeal is preferred against the order/award dated 20/02/2007 passed in consumer complaint No.82/2005 Shri Swapnil Bandu Kadam V/s. The Principal, Indira Gandhi Engineering College, Koparkhairane by Addl. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Thane (Forum below in short). There is delay of 149 days in filing appeal. Hence, Misc. Application No.1964/2007 is filed to condone the same. Reason given for condonation of delay is that copy of the impugned order was received by post on 21/05/2007 by the appellant/org. complainant at his native place. He fell ill due to Infective Hepatitis soon thereafter and advised a complete rest for five months. Appellants affidavit duly corroborated by medical certificate supports his such contention. Delay is neither intentional nor deliberate and thus, being satisfactorily explained, we find it proper to condone the same. Misc. Appl. No.1964/2007 stands allowed accordingly. Coming to the ...

Deputy Executive Engineer Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution C ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Per Smt. S.P .Lale, Honble Member 1. This appeal filed by original O.Ps/Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd. is directed against the order dated 30/6/2008 passed by District Consumer Forum, Satara in consumer complaint no.36/2008, whereby Forum below directed O.Ps to furnish fresh bill to the complainant on average basis for the past two years only from the month in which meter was reported burnt i.e. January 2008. Forum below further directed O.Ps to make available the meter in such a manner that it can take the meter reading and O.Ps shall also furnish electricity bill to the appellant from time to time and also awarded Rs.1000/- towards cost and mental agony. Being aggrieved by the said order, O.Ps have filed the present appeal. Facts giving rise to this appeal are as under:- 2. Complainant is an owner of the land situated at Kodoli. Complainant is having the electric connection of 10 H.P. to irrigate the said land. According to complainant, he had paid the bill of th...