Mumbai Court February 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Friends Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-01-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)BomCR849
Patel J.N., J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner is a Co-operative Housing Society, registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, and has challenged the Circular issued under Rule 74 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961, which vests in the Registrar powers to levy audit charges and supervision charges payable annually, on or before a specified date by all or any class of societies, including the Societies in liquidation, at such rates as may be fixed by the Registrar with the approval of the State Government.3. The specific challenge is in respect of the Circular, dated 4th June, 1992, issued by Respondent No. 2 in exercise of his power under Rule 74 of the said Rules, which is annexed as Annexure-I, which, according to the petitioner, is contrary to provision of Section 81(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.4. The petitioner has also sought quashing of various Circulars, which form the subject-matter of the...
Gomantak Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Mormugao Port Trust and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-01-2006
Reported in: 2006(6)BomCR297; [2005(106)FLR437]
Khandeparkar R.M.S., J.1. Heard Advocates for the parties. The petitioner-Trade Union seeks declaration that the waiting list prepared in anticipation of 100 vacancies is inoperative consequent to filling up of 100 vacancies and that, therefore, the recruitment of the respondents No. 3 to 69 in the vacancies arising after filling up of the said 100 posts, is null and void.2. The facts relevant for the decision in the matter are that an advertisement came to be issued on 11-3-2000 by the respondent No. 1 inviting applications from eligible candidates for the posts of Gang Workers. In terms of the notice inviting the applications, there were 100 vacancies for Gang Workers, one being reserved for SC, 5 for ST and the remaining 89 being unreserved. About 107 members of the petitioner applied for the said posts, 60 applicants therefrom were selected and recruited. About 31 more were called for interview, but could not be selected on account of failure to procure their birth certificates and...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›