Mumbai Court October 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shakil Ahmed Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-2004
Reported in: 2005(2)MhLj90
V.M. Kanade, J.1. The appellant is challenging the judgment and order passed by the Ad hoc Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case No. 51 of 2002 dated 22nd August, 2002. By the said Order, the Ad hoc Addl. District and Sessions Judge convicted the appellant original accused No. 1 under Section 489C of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo Imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default to suffer another l '/2 years.2. The appellant along with two others charged under Section 489C of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that on 6th April, 2000, the appellant accused was found to be in possession of forged or counterfeit currency of Rs. 500/- denomination which were 300 in number and accordingly, a charge was framed against the appellant and two others. The trial Court convicted the accused under the said charge and the appellant has therefore, preferred this appeal challenging the judgment and order passed by the...
Rajesh Chari Vs. Zuari Structural Works
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-2004
Reported in: 2(2007)BC7
N.A. Britto, J.1. The applicant herein is an accused who has been convicted in Criminal Case No. 14/N/2000/D under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act, for short) and sentenced to undergo 15 days Simple Imprisonment and to pay compensation of Rs. 45,000/- and which conviction and sentence has been upheld by learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Margao, in Criminal Appeal No. 30 of 2001 by his judgment/order dated 14th February, 2003.2. The applicant/accused in the present Revision Application has prayed for setting aside of the said judgments/orders of both the Courts below.3. The case of the complainant in the said complaint filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vasco-Da-Gama, was that the complainant was a partner of the firm known as M/s. Zuari Structural Works, Engineers and Contractors and that the accused on or about 1st December, 1999, had issued to the said complainant a cheque for Rs. 45,000/- drawn on Bank of Goa, Vasco-Da-Gama, towards t...
Mr. Kamal Lama Alias Akal Man Taman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through S ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-2004
Reported in: (2005)107BOMLR754
N.A. Britto, J.1. The appellant herein, who is an accused (No. 1) in Special Criminal Case No. 4/2001 has filed the present appeal against the judgment/order of the learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Court, Mapusa, convicting and sentencing him under Section 20(b)(ii) of N.D.P.S. Act, 1985 (Act, for short) to undergo Rule 1, for a term of ten years and fine of Rs. 1 lakh in default to undergo S.I. for one year.2. The accused was prosecuted in the said case upon a complaint filed by Shri M.P. Vaz, Superintendent of Central Excise, Anti-Smuggling Unit, Margao, Goa.3. The case of the complainant, briefly stated, was that on 14.11.2000 at about 15.00 hrs. Shri J.T. Cruz, Inspector of Customs and Central Excise, Margao received information that one person by name Shri Kamal Lama (A. 1), aged about 25 years, fair complexion, short in stature and having oriental looks would be in possession of sizable quantity of hashish which was meant to be supplied to a prospective customer near about Starco ...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›