Mumbai Court September 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vardhman Cloth Stores and ors. Vs. Anil
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-01-2003
Reported in: 2004ACJ393
A.B. Naik, J.1. The appeal filed under Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, challenged the order passed by the 2nd Labour Court, Ahmednagar in Application No. WCA No. 77 of 1998, whereby the learned 2nd Labour Court, Ahmednagar, has allowed the claim partly and awarded compensation of Rs. 17,123 to the applicant with other consequential benefits. Mr. Upadhye, learned advocate appearing for the appellants raised substantial question of law in this appeal by contending that while deciding the application the learned Judge has not considered properly item No. 26 of Schedule II of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Entry No. 26 reads thus:'(xxvi) employed in the handling or transport of goods in, or within the precincts of,--(a) any warehouse or other place in which goods are stored, and in which on any one day of the preceding twelve months ten or more persons have been so employed, or(b) any market in which on any one day of the preceding twelve months fifty or more persons have ...
Malabar Oil Marketing Co. Vs. Asstt. Cit
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-01-2003
Reported in: (2004)91TTJ(Mumbai)348
ORDERG.C. Gupta, J.M.This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 1991-92 is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals).2. The ground of appeal Nos. 1 and 2 are regarding the addition of Rs. 8 lacs on account of credit entries under section 68 of the Act confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The learned counsel for the assessee argued that the assessee has unsecured loans of over Rs. 3 crores during the relevant period pertaining to 105 parties. The assessee was able to secure confirmations from 103 creditors. But the assessee could not procure the confirmations from the remaining two parties for the reason that these parties were out of town. The learned counsel for the assessee argued that the credits were genuine and the amount of loan was received per account payee cheque and were paid per account payee cheque only. The assessee had in its letter dated 14-12-1993 to the assessing officer has explained that the assessee is trying to get the confirmation from ...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›