Mumbai Court December 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Satnam Ahuja Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-02-1997
Reported in: 1998(5)BomCR43; 1998CriLJ1952; 1998(3)MhLj245
ORDERS.S. Parkar, J.1. Rule. By consent rule is made returnable forthwith. The learnedCounsel for the respondents waive service. Heard the Counsel for the parties at length.2. The petition challenges the order dated 21st November, 1997, passed by thelearned Metropolitan Magistrate, presiding over the 10th Court, Andheri, Mumbai inCriminal Case No. 654/N/1997 whereby six animals which were detained at SanjayGandhi National Park, Borivali, Mumbai under the previous order dated 29th October,1997 belonging to respondent No. 2, were directed to be returned to the respondentNo. 2 under certain conditions.3. The brief facts leading to the present petition can be summarised thus:The respondent No. 2 is the owner of the circus called 'Golden Circus' which is, at present, running its shows at Jogeshwari, Mumbai. The shows commenced at the said place from 25th October, 1997. The petitioner who is an Honorary General Secretary of Society or a trust called 'Ahimsa' a registered Public Charitable Tr...
Yashwant Prabhakar Kamble Vs. Prasad Narhari Karanjkar and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-01-1997
Reported in: 1998(1)ALLMR693; 1998(2)BomCR446; 1998(1)MhLj541
ORDERF.I. Rebello, J. 1. Rule. 2. Learned Counsel for the respondents waive service. By consent. Rule made returnable and heard forthwith. 3. The petitioner tenant has filed this petition to impugn orders dated 5th April 1997 passed in Regular Civil Suit No. 217 of 1989 of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Wai and judgment dated 5th September, 1997 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 241 of 1997 by the Second Additional District Judge, Satara. 4. An application for eviction of the petitioner was filed by present respondent No. 1 and the original applicant No. 2 Smt. Maltibai Narhari Karanjkar (since deceased) represented by present respondent Nos. 2-A to 2-F Defendant No. 2 in the said application was another brother who is now represented by legal heirs who are respondent Nos. 3-A to 3-C. Defendant No. 4 was the youngest brother who is present respondent No. 4. The application was moved on the ground that the original applicants need the premises for maintaining the family and fo...
Shri Bhagwatsingh Gaud Vs. State of Goa
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-01-1997
Reported in: 1998BomCR(Cri)485
ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. The accused/appellant Shri Bhagwatsingh Gaud has come in appeal before this Court challenging his conviction and sentence. The Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Court, Mapusa, vide his judgment dated 31st October, 1996 convicted the accused/appellant for the offence punishable under section 20(b)(ii) of the N.D.P.S. Act 1985 and sentenced him to suffer Rigourous Imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rupees one lakh and in default to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for two years.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that on 28-11-95 at 10.00 a.m. an information was received that a North Indian person slaying in Room No. 6 of hotel Anjuna Beach Resort at D'Mello Waddo, Anjuna, was dealing in charas. Shri Gopal Jadhav (P.W. 4) who was officer-in-charge of A.N.C. Police Station accordingly recorded the information in writing and sent the same to the Deputy Superintendent of Police. P.W. 4 decided to raid the said premises and accordingly secured the presence of Mr. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›