Skip to content

Mumbai Court November 1996 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 01 1996

Shri Shankar Arjun Gaonkar and ors. Vs. the Co-operative Tribunal of G ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-01-1996

Reported in: (1997)99BOMLR721a

F.I. Rebello, J.1. The petitioner by this petition impugns the order dated 15th September, 1992 passed by the Co-operative Tribunal, Goa, Daman & Diu, Panaji, and order dated 31st March, 1989, passed by the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies, North Zone, Mapusa, Goa, whereby the aforesaid authorities have rejected the application of the petitioner to refer for arbitration the disputes raised by the petitioner. The petitioner had moved three applications against the respondents No. 4. It was the case of the petitioner that his vehicle was attached in execution proceedings passed by the Registrar's nominee on 23rd July, 1983, amongst others against the petitioner himself, for recovery of amount due to the respondent No. 4. The petitioner claimed that the detention of the vehicle, now in custody of the said Bank was illegal and hence he is entitled for compensation from the Bank towards the loss suffered by him due to the detention of the vehicle. It was further contended by th...


Nov 01 1996

Ponds (India) Limited Vs. Dputy Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-01-1996

Reported in: (1997)59TTJ(Mumbai)560

ORDERO. P. JAIN, J.M. :This appeal is directed against the order of the CIT(A) dt. 18th December, 1995 pertaining to the asst. yr. 1992-93.2. In ground No. 1, objection has been raised to the following disallowances sustained by the CIT(A) under s. 37(2A) of the IT Act :Rs.(a) Expenditure on lunch/refreshments served outside the office premises to employees/business associates 40,000(b) 25 per cent of Rs. 2,12,941 being expenses on lunch/ refreshments served within office premises to employees/ business associates 53,235(c) Out of pocket expenses incurred on business trips of foreign visitors to India - hotel bills including room rent Rs. 16,402 and Laundry expenses. 312 18,199(d) Expenditure on staff get-together 18,0773. As regards item (a) above, it was the case of the assessee that the expenditure incurred on lunch to employees and the business associates, etc. outside the premises of the assessee-company does not amount to an entertainment. This contention of the assessee was not ...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial