Mumbai Court August 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay S/O Namdeo Mutha Vs. the Director, Maharashtra Educational Rese ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-02-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)BomCR656
B.N. Deshmukh, J.1. Rule in all the petitions, returnable forthwith. The learned A.G.P. waives service on behalf of the concerned respondents.2. These petitions raise important point of law and affect large number of Assistant Teachers teaching in different primary schools. The petitioners in all these petitions are appointed as Assistant Teachers in different primary schools. One of the conditions mentioned at the time of appointment is that they have to obtain D.Ed. qualification within 5 years of their appointments. In all these petitions, at the time of appointments, these Assistant Teachers had not obtained D.Ed. qualification. They were required to obtain D.Ed. qualification within five years; otherwise, their services were made liable to be terminated. In almost all the petitions, the petitioners, who were appointed as Assistant Teachers, were granted approval by the Education Department, and in the remaining cases, by the competent authorities constituted in Municipal Councils,...
Modern Mills Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-01-1995
Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT90Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No.PPM-1799/BI1015/86, dated 24-2-1987 of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay, confirming the order-in-original No. A-45/86, dated 22-7-1986 of the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Div. A Bombay, holding that the cotton yarn cleared from the appellant mills, was in a finished condition and the mills were not eligible to avail of the benefit of procedure under Rule 56B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and as such, no permission could be granted and also confirming the demand for Rs. 7,20,140.11 by way of duty on the cotton yarn so removed, during the period from June, 1985 to December, 1985, as demanded vide Show Cause Notice, dated 6-1-1986.2. The appellants, engaged in manufacture of cotton yarn, falling within Tariff Item 18A as also T.I. 18, 91-1 and 22-1 of the Excise Tariff Act, used to send cotton yarn on bobbins to another firm, vide Rule 56B of the said Rules, for reeling them on cross reel hanks, con...
Smt. Laura Britto Vs. V.C.D. Singh Secretary Preventive Detention and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-01-1995
Reported in: 1996(3)BomCR265; 1996CriLJ371
Agarwal, J.1. By an order bearing No. SPL 3 (A)/PND 0194/56 dated 24th August 1994 passed by Shri C. D. Singh, Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (46 of 1988) hereinafter for the sake of brevity PIT NDPS Act, Shri Victor Anthony Fernandes has been detained. The Petitioner who is the sister of the detenu seeks to challenge the aforesaid order of detention and the consequent detention of the detenu by filing the instant habeas corpus petition. 2. The incident which has led to the passing of the aforesaid order has taken place on 2nd September 1993. The Detenu came to be arrested in connection with the said offences on 18th September 1993. On 8th April 1994, the detenu was directed to be released on bail on condition of his reporting every week. The condition of reporting every week was relaxed and the detenu was directed to report every 15 days by an order passed on 31s...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›