Mumbai Court November 1995 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nathu Bapu Mhaskar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-01-1995
Reported in: 1996CriLJ2120
Rane, J. 1. The appellant herein is the accused in the Sessions Case No. 87/1990 on the file of IInd Additional Sessions Judge, District Satara. He was charged under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The Learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara by his Judgment dated 4th September 1992 found the appellant guilty of the offence of murder under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced him for rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in default to undergo R.I. for two years. The appellant/accused has challenged in this appeal the said findings of the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara and his conviction and fine as imposed. 2. Before we proceed to consider and deal with the merits of the appeal, it is necessary to mention certain intervening circumstances as have happened in this appeal. This appeal was heard and was disposed of by a Bench of Judges comprising of V. H. Bhairavia & P. S. Patankar. JJ., by their Judgment dated 2nd September 1994. The appeal ...
Dattatraya Kashinath and ors. Vs. Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-01-1995
Reported in: (1996)IILLJ169Bom
B.N. Srikrishna, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an Order of the Industrial Court, Pune dated Pune dated 25th March, 1991 made in Complaints (ULP) No. 345 of 1986, 346 of 1986, 347 of 1986 and 348 of 1986 under the provisions of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 2. The Petitioners filed Complaints under Section 28 read with Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the Act before the Industrial Court, Pune. The Petitioners alleged in their Complaints that the First Respondent was a co-operative sugar manufacturing factory covered under the provisions of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 (BIR Act), that though they were working as regular though they were working as regular employees in the service of the First Respondent, their names were not being shown on the records of the First Respondent and they the records of the First R...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Vs. Dr. B.V. Manek
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-01-1995
Reported in: 1996(2)BomCR254; (1996)98BOMLR236
Ashok Agarwal, J.1. Appellant is the original defendant Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. By the present appeal it seeks to impugn an interlocutory order passed by Single Judge (A.P. Shah, J.) on 19th of August, 1995 in Notice of Motion No. 2735 of 1995 in S.C. Suit No. 2936 of 1995 (reported in : AIR1996Bom53 ), whereby the defendants have been directed to reconnect the telephone connection of the plaintiff who is a doctor by profession. The reason given by the defendants for disconnecting the plaintiff's telephone is that the plaintiff's father Shri V.N. Manek has fallen in arrears of telephone charges in respect of his telephone No. 5680227. In regard to the arrears of Shri V.N. Manek his aforesaid telephone has already been disconnected. As far as plaintiff's telephone No. 5603314 is concerned, there are no arrears as all the bills have been paid. It is the contention of the defendants that it is entitled to disconnect the telephone connection of the plaintiff for the reason that his ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›