Mumbai Court June 1994 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B.N. Chandra and Co. Vs. Swadeshi Mills Co. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-08-1994
Reported in: 1995(2)BomCR239; (1994)96BOMLR236
S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners seek to set aside the Award dated 2nd March, 1991 filed in this Court and numbered as 'Award No. 70 of 1991'.2. The petitioners are wholesale dealers in Textile piece goods. The 1st respondents are a textile mill manufacturing and selling, inter alia, textile piece goods. The 1st respondents are members of 'The Millownors' Association Bombay' who have been made 2nd respondents in the petition in the name of 'The Bombay Millowners Association' and hence hereinafter described as 'the 2nd respondents'. The 2nd respondents have framed rules for resolving disputes arising out of any contract for sale and purchase of Indian piece goods or yarn entered into between a member and a non-member through arbitration. The 3rd respondent had acted as arbitrator in the disputes between the 1st respondents and the petitioners which were referred to arbitration in accordance with rules for Arbitration on Indian piece goods and yarn of the 2nd re...
Keshavrao S/O Narayanrao Gadhave and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-08-1994
Reported in: 1995(2)BomCR450
N.P. Chapalgaonker, J.1. Heard Counsel for the parties. Rule taken up for hearing forthwith by consent of the parties.2. Elections to the Village Panchayat, Salgaon Partur Taluk of Jalna District took place on 5th November, 1992. Petitioners 1 and 2 were declared by the Returning Officer as having been elected from Ward No. 2 since they secured 84 and 83 votes respectively by granting a certificate duly signed. It appears that four days thereafter i.e. on 11th November, 1992, an objection was raised to the validity of the said counting and the Returning Officer was pleased to recount the votes and found that instead of the petitioners, respondents 3 and 4 are entitled to be declared elected since they have secured more votes than the petitioners. Therefore, on 11th November, 1992, respondents 3 and 4 namely, Kalavatibai and Rajaram came to be declared as having been elected to Village Panchayat Salgaon from Ward No. 2 from woman reserved and general constituencies respectively. This ac...
Ramesh Narang Vs. Rama Narang and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-08-1994
Reported in: 1995(2)BomCR7; 1995CriLJ1685
M.L. Pendse, J.1. This appeal is preferred by original defendant No. 1 to challenge legality of order dated August 17, 1992 passed by learned Single Judge on Notice of Motion No. 1593 of 1992. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge has restrained the appellant and respondent No. 5 from in any manner acting upon decisions purported to have been taken at the board metting of respondent No. 2 company alleged to have been held on July 13, 1992. The Trial Judge also granted injunction restraining the appellant and respondent No. 3 from in any manner obstructing or interfering with functioning of respondent No. 1 as Chairman and Managing Director of respondent No. 2 company. The complaint in this appeal is in respect of grant of injunction restraining the appellant and respondent No. 5 from obstructing respondent No. l to function as Chairman and Managing Director of the company.2. The facts which gave rise to the litigation, shorn of details, are not in dispute and are required to ...
Sambhaji Laxmanrao Pawar Vs. Abdul Wahed S/O. Rahmatullah
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-07-1994
Reported in: 1995(1)BomCR608
G.R. Majithia, J.1. First Appeal No. 180 of 1986, Sambhaji s/o Laxmanrao Pawar v. Abdul Wahed s/o Rahmatulla, is directed against the judgment and decree dated August 28, 1986 passed by Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nanded in Special Suit No. 44 of 1984 decreeing the suit of the plaintiff-respondent for specific performance of agreement to sell dated November 28, 1981, as modified on March 31, 1982 in respect of shop bearing Gram Panchayat No. 398, situated at Naigaon Bazar, District - Nanded.2. Abdul Wahed Rahmatullah - plaintiff respondent (hereafter referred to as the Vendee) filed a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated November 28, 1981 in respect of shop bearing Gram Panchayat No. 398, situated at Naigaon Bazar, District - Nanded against Sambhaji s/o Laxmanrao Pawar - defendant appellant (hereafter referred to as the Vendor) inter alia pleading that the vendor agreed to sell the shop for a consideration of Rs. 1,00,051/-; the sale price was to be paid in two in...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›