Mumbai Court January 1993 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Jutex Vs. Telecom Divisional Manager and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-05-1993
Reported in: AIR1993Bom284; 1994(3)BomCR279
ORDERKamat, J. 1. We have heard learned Counsel for rule. Accordingly, rule is made to be heard forthwith. 2. Petitioner is a partnership firm and was allotted telephone bearing No. 3299 at Vasco da Gama. The petitioner had instituted Writ Petition No. 163 of 1992 in this Court for an appropriate writ directing respondents Nos. 1 and 2 to refer the dispute of excessive billing for the period between 16th of August, 1991 and 15th of October, 1991 for an amount of Rs. 29,941/- under Section 78 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 to Statutory Arbitration. Rule was made absolute in that writ petition by the order dated 24th of April, 1992. Based upon the direction of this Court, respondent No. 3 who is the Telecom District Manager at Kolhapur, was appointed as the Arbitrator by the Union of India. By a communication dated 8th of June, 1992 the 3rd respondent, the Arbitrator while forwarding a copy of minutes of proceedings held on 5th of June, 1992, called upon the petitioner to intimate to ...
Kisandas Gulabchand Kataria Vs. Smt. Rukmini Kisan Alias Popat Vighne ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-03-1993
Reported in: (1993)95BOMLR781
Bhimrao N. Naik, J.1. This is a petition field by the landlord under Article 227 of the Constitution whereby he has challenged the dismissal of his suit by the learned II Extra Assistant Judge, Pune dated 25th August, 1981, in Civil Appeal No. 551 of 1979.2. Few facts which are relevant for the purpose of this petition are as follows:The petitioner field Civil Suit No. 51 of 1975 in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Daund, for possession on the ground of arrears of rent or non-payment of rent, secondly on the ground of sub-letting and thirdly on the ground of carrying on permanent construction of Bhatti {oven) in the suit premises and replacing the door and ventilator by fixing at its place a rolling shutter. The learned Judge delivered his judgment and order on 31st August, 1979 and decreed the suit for non-payment of rent and on the ground of permanent construction.3. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the aforesaid judgment and order the respondent-tenant filed Civil Appea...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›