Mumbai Court July 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sohan Singh Jodh Singh Kohli Vs. Chandrakanta Goyal
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-01-1991
Reported in: 1991(3)BomCR357
H. Suresh, J.1. The petitioner was a candidate of Janata Dal in the election held for the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly on 27th February 1990 from Constituency No. 33-Matunga Constituency. The respondent was a candidate of Bharatiya Janata Party (hereinafter referred to as 'B.J.P'). She secured 31,530 votes while the petitioner secured 28,021 votes. He came third, inasmuch as, there was a Congress candidate who secured 28,426 votes. This petition is to challenge the election of the respondent on the ground of corrupt practices under sections 123(3) and 123(3A) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1951').2. The relevant portion of the petitioner's case, in so far as, he sought to establish before me is this :That there was an alliance between B.J.P and Shiv Sena during the last election for the Assembly seats and that they appealed to the voters on the basis of Hindu religion. The relevant facts are that there was a meeting of the said all...
Onoda Engineering and Consulting Company Limited Vs. Project and Equip ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-01-1991
Reported in: 1991(4)BomCR334
D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. This is a plaintiff's motion of its own suit filed as a matter of abundant caution during pendency of arbitration proceedings already initiated by it in respect of the same claim. The plaintiffs are seeking stay of this suit under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 as a matter of abundant caution in view of it apprehension that in absence of a stay order the pending arbitration proceedings may be affected by operation of section 35 of the Arbitration Act. In alternative, the plaintiffs have sought relief under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure to the same effect or at least limited relief as may be moulded by the Court having regard to the fact and circumstances of the case. The plaintiffs are also seeking a clarificatory order from this Court to the effect that the pending arbitration proceedings are not and will not be affected by reason of pendency of the suit in terms of section 35 of the said Act on the ground that right from the beginning the plai...
Kachru S/O Jairam Jadhav and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-01-1991
Reported in: 1991(4)BomCR66
M.S. Vaidya, J.1. This writ petition is directed against an order dated 11-3-1991, passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Criminal Revision Application No. 54 of 1991. dismissing the revision petition filed by the present writ petitioner No. 1. In the aforesaid revision petition, an order dated 14-2-1991 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Kannad in C.R. No. 113 of 1990 of Pishore Police Station was challenged.2. Police-sub-Inspector, Pishore had lodged an F.I.R. on 18-12-1990, stating that on receipt of an information on that day, that the present petitioner No. 1 was purchasing cotton illegally from the agriculturists for the purposes of selling the same outside the State in contravention of the provisions of the Maharashtra Raw Cotton (Procurement, Processing and Marketing) Act, 1791, a raid was organized and it was found at village Padli, that cotton was being weighed and loaded in a truck. The petitioner No. 1 was nothing down the weights and on int...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›