Mumbai Court December 1991 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Asstt. Collector of Cus., R and I (P) Vs. HussaIn Abbas Shaikh and Oth ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-02-1991
Reported in: 1992(59)ELT394(Bom)
1. This appeal is filed by the Assistant Collector of Customs, R & I (P) Bombay-original Complainant, against the Judgment and order dated 11th March 1983 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 32nd Court, Esplanade, Bombay in Criminal Case No. 113/CW/1982. 2. By the aforesaid Judgment and order the trial Court acquitted respondents Nos. 1 and 2 under Section 135(1)(a) and Section 135(1)(b) both read with Section 135(1)(i) of the Customs Act and Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act. 3. Few facts which are necessary for deciding this appeal are as under :- Respondent No. 1 in this case was, at the relevant time, when the incident took place, a Head Constable Writer and respondent No. 2 was a Sub-Inspector. The incident as alleged by the prosecution took place on 2nd September 1980. At the relevant time both accused Nos. 1 and 2 were attached to Immigration Department and were posted at Santacruz Air-Port. On the said date early morning Intelligence...
Chaganlal Prahladrai Singhania Vs. the Maharashtra State Co-operative ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-02-1991
Reported in: (1995)IIILLJ278Bom
Pendse, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as a Senior Grader on Salary of Rs. 600/- per month by the respondent on November 19, 1970. The petitioner was arrested on March 15, 1973 by Police authorities at Malshiras and was charge-sheeted in Criminal Case No. 70 of 1974 for misappropriation of certain amount. The petitioner was released from jail pending trial on August 25, 1973. When the petitioner went to resume his duties, the respondent informed him that his services stand terminated with effect from August 26, 1973. The order of termination does not set put any reason for termination, nor any notice was given or enquiry held before issuing order of termination. It seems that the services of the petitioner were terminated solely because the petitioner was arrested by police.2. The Judicial Magistrate, Malshiras acquitted the petitioner of the charge of misappropriation on May 18, 1977. The petitioner thereafter addressed letter dated July 25, 1977, and August 6, 1977, requesting the...
Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Horological Trades and Agencie ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-02-1991
Reported in: 1991(4)BomCR285
S.M. Daud, J.1. This revision is by the decree-holder aggrieved by a decision of the Appellate Bench of the Court of Small Causes at Bombay upon an appeal in obstructionist proceedings.2. The decree-holder/petitioner is the owner of property known as Indian Globe Chambers at 142, Fort Street, Bombay-400 001. judgment-debtor/respondent No. 2 was a tenant in respect of a portion of the aforementioned building. On 12th October, 1966, the decree-holder gave a quit notice to the judgment-debtor terminating its tenancy and calling upon the judgment-debtor to deliver vacant and peaceful possession to it by a particular date. The notice not having been complied with, the decree-holder filed a suit for ejectment the grounds being that the judgment-debtor was irregular in payment of rent and further that it had sub-let the premises which sub-letting was impermissible, whether considered under the contract of tenancy or the law. The judgment-debtor filed a written statement contesting the suit fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›