Mumbai Court October 1988 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lalan Shinde Vs. State of Goa and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-04-1988
Reported in: 1988(4)BomCR246
C.S. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Petitioner was directly recruited as a Mukhya Sevika in the then Collectorate of Goa. By an order dated 17th December, 1986 along with others, she was confirmed in the said post. She is a trained graduate, being B.Sc (Hons.) and has also undergone training as Mukhya Sevika at Udaipur, Home Science College and job training for Child Development Project Officer at Delhi. It appears that her services, along with others, came to be transferred to the Directorate of Social Welfare, and some time in the year 1977, the staff of the Child Welfare Projects run by the State Social Welfare Board were also taken over by the Government. A tentative seniority list was thereafter prepared and circulated for inviting objections. In the year 1982, Rules under Article 309 of the Constitution of India came to be framed , known as Recruitment Rules. It is the case of the petitioner that for appointment as Mukhya Sevika, both by direct recruitment or promotion, a Degree of a recogn...
Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Indian Farmers Fertilisers
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-03-1988
Reported in: (1989)(42)ELT85Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This is an appeal filed by the Department against the order of the Collector (Appeals) No. B-398/AHD-23/83 dated 22-2-83/1-3-83.2. The respondents are the manufacturers of fertilisers. They were availing of the Exemption in terms of Notification No. 178/77 and followed by Notification No. 201/79. The input received by them for duty paid Phosphoric Acid was classified under Tariff Item 68 and the same was utilised in the manufacture of fertilisers. As per the original order of the Assistant Collector, since the respondents were not maintaining the set off register during the period 8-3-1979 to 3-6-1979, they were not entitled to avail the proforma credit. As regards the period from 4-6-1979 to 9-9-1979 credit taken by them is not in order, since they have not filed the declaration as per Notification No. 201/79. The aforesaid order of the Assistant Collector was set aside by the order of the Collector (Appeals) on the ground that in so far as the period from 8-3-1979 to 3-6-1979 is ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›