Mumbai Court May 1987 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Paras Chand Dhadha and ors. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-12-1987
Reported in: (1988)(15)LC97Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These are four appeals filed by four appellants against the common Order-in-original No. S/14-7-14/83 Pint, dated 24-9-1983 passed by the Collector of Customs (Preventive) under which he confiscated diamonds weighing 117.40 carats valued at Rs. 3,17,177/- recovered from the residential premises of Shri Radhakrishan Kejriwal appellant in appeal No. 21/85 on 10-11-1983. In addition to the confiscation of the diamonds, the Collector levied a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on each of the four appellants Under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act. Feeling aggrieved with the Collector's order of confiscation of the diamonds and levy of penalties, the appellants have come up in appeal to the Tribunal against the Collector's order. Since these appeals arise out of the common order of the Collector, they were heard together at the request of the appellants and the respondents and are being disposed of under this common order.2. The brief facts of the case are that the residential premises of Shri Rad...
Amol Alias Amolkumar Gajanan Naik Vs. Director of Municipal Administra ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-12-1987
Reported in: 1987(3)BomCR721
G.D. Kamat, J.1. This petition bring to the fore section 46(c) of the Goa, Damn and Diu Municipalities Act, 1968 for short 'the Act'. That section reads :---'46. Disqualification of Councillor during his term of office.---(1) A Councillor shall be disqualified to hold office as such, if at any time during his term of office, he---(a) ...........................................................................................(b) ............................................................................................(c) is professionally interested or engaged in any case for or against the Council; or(d) ............................................................................................and he shall be disabled subject to the provisions of sub-section (3) from continuing to be a Councillor and his office shall become vacant;Provided that ---(i) a Councillor shall not be disqualified under clause (c) if he is engaged for the Council without receiving any remuneration therefore ...
Kishan Shamdas Bhatia and anr. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-06-1987
Reported in: (1988)(33)ELT388Tri(Mum.)bai
1. Both these appeals arise out of and are directed against the Order No. S/l4-4-233/81 Pint, dated 17.11.1982 passed by the Additional Collector of Customs (P), Bombay.1. As these appeals involve common questions of law and facts, they are clubbed together; heard together; hence this common order.2. During the pendency of the appeal CD(BOM)536 of 83 the appellant had died and the legal representatives were brought on record.3. The appellant in CD(BOM)537 of 83 is a partnership firm and the original appellant in CD(BOM)536 of 83 was the managing partner of the said firm. On information that Shri Kishan Shamdas Bhatia was dealing in smuggled cameras and photo-graphie materials, through his firm M/s. Shah & Sons Photo Store and M/s. Jaikishen & Brothers, the godown premises, "the shop premises and the residence of Kishan Shamdas Bhatia were searched on 13.2.1981. From the residential premises goods worth Rs. 17,130/- CIF market value Rs. 51,390/-; from the godown premises goods ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›