Mumbai Court October 1986 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
AshwIn Vanaspati Industries Pvt. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-1986
Reported in: (1988)(16)LC41Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The Revision Application filed before the Government of India against the order-in-Review No. 4/Collr./81 dated 17th October, 1981 passed by the Collector of Customs and Central Excise, Ahmedabad statutorily stood transferred to the Tribunal for being heard as an appeal.2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as under: The appellants, M/s. Ashwin Vanaspati Industries (P) Ltd., imported a consignment of 1022 M/Tons of crude stearin in bulk and sought clearance against a licence No. P/W/2915115/C/XX/77/8/79 dated 24.9.1979. They also filed a Bond on 16.10.1980 with the Assistant Collector of Customs, Kandla for a sum of Rs. 36,28,000/- and requested provisional assessment of the imported goods pending chemical test and submission of documents. The Proper officer of Kandla Customs assessed the said goods provisionally. He also allowed clearance of the goods under OGL in terms of para 179(5) of the Import Policy A.M. 1981.3. The Collector of Customs and Central ...
Fili (Firose) B. Elavia and anr. Vs. F.R. Engineer
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-1986
Reported in: 1987(1)BomCR1; (1986)88BOMLR628
S.M. Daud, J.1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution is directed against a finding in section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 (PSCC Act) application which will have the effect of evicting petitioners from flat bearing No. R-17, First Floor, Navroz Baug, Lalbaug, Parel, Bombay.2. The aforementioned flat belongs to a public trust and was let out to the deceased father of the respondent---who shall hereinafter be referred to as 'Amrolia'. The rent payable by Amrolia was Rs. 25/- per , month and the flat measured about 480 sq. ft. comprising two rooms, a kitchen, toilet and passage etc. Amrolia had inducted his son Jamshed together with that person's wife and two children to stay with him in the flat aforementioned. Later on, relations between the inductor and inductees deteriorated. This led Amrolia to file a section 41 PSCC Act petition against Jamshed. An order of ejectment was passed and this was on 7-2-1972. Petitioner No. 2 is the grand-daughter of Amrolia b...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›