Mumbai Court March 1984 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
inamdar Vahab Badasha and Ors. Vs. Symbosis Society's Law Collegs, Pun ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-02-1984
Reported in: AIR1984Bom451; 1984(2)BomCR382; 1985MhLJ438
Jamdar, J.1. This challenge in this Writ Petition is to Rule 5 of Part IV of the Rules of Bar Council of India in respect of the Standards of Legal Education & Recognition of Degree in Law.2. Up to academic year 1981-82 as per Rule 1 of Part IV of the them existing Bar standards of legal education and recognition of degrees in law, for admission as an Advocate, degree in law obtained form any University in the territory of India after 12 th day of March 1967 was recognised for the purpose of section 24(1)(c)(iii) of the Advocate's Act, 1961, provided that at the time of joining the course of instruction in the law for a degree in law, the candidate waw a graduate of University or possessed such academic qualification to a graduate's degree of a University by the Bar Council of India and that the law degree was contained after undergoing a course of studying law for a minimum period of three years as provided in therules. However, in exercise of the powers conferred by S. 49 read with S...
Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Ci ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-01-1984
Reported in: (1984)41CTR(Bom)172; [1984]150ITR484(Bom); [1984]18TAXMAN288(Bom)
Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. This reference pertains to the assessment years 1964-65 to 1969-70. In respect of these assessment years the following questions have been referred to us for determination under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 :'(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the amounts of Rs. 21,210, Rs. 17,239, Rs. 652, Rs. 1,994, Rs. 5,308 and Rs. 53,561 standing to the credit of the reserve for doubtful debtors account in the assessment years 1964-65 to 1969-70 were includible in the computation of the capital of the assessee-company in respective years ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the amount of Rs. 3,60,000 standing to the credit of the dividend reserve account in the assessment years 1965-66 and 1966-67 were includible in the computation of the capital of the assessee-company for the assessment year 1965-66 and 1966-67 ? (3) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the amounts of Rs. 5,89,039, Rs. 5,63...
Gopal Ramchandra Ajgaonkar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-01-1984
Reported in: 1984(1)BomCR411
H.H. Kantharia, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 1977 arises out of a judgment and order recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, Bombay, on 22nd September, 1976 in Sessions Case No. 245 of 1975.2. The relevant facts giving rise to this appeal are that on or about 7th November, 1974, at about 11.00 p.m., an information was received by Jogeshwari Police Station that there were riots in Meghwadi area within its jurisdiction. On receipt of this information the duty officer, Sub-Inspector, Mohan Patil (P.W. 7) along with his staff rushed there. He was followed by Sub-Inspector Ramugrah Singh (P.W. 1) along with five police constables. Sometimes thereafter a commotion was heard at Idga Maidan. Therefore, Sub-Inspector Patil with wireless van went there and Sub-Inspector or Singh remained at the junction of Shamnagar and Meghwadi where trouble was going on. Further case of the prosecution is that at about 2.00 a.m. Sub-Inspector Singh heard further commotion coming fro...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›