Mumbai Court February 1981 Judgments
Sheila Umesh Tahiliani Vs. Soli Phirozshaw Shroff and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-03-1981
Reported in: AIR1981Bom175
ORDER1. This is a petition filed under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 by the petitioner for the custody of her minor son named Malcolm. The petitioner who was formerly a Zoroastrian by faith was married to one Kersi Soli Shroff according to the rites and tenets of the Zoroastrian religion. The said Kersi Shroff died in Bombay on the 18th April, 1979 under rather tragic circumstances. On 13th March, 1979, i.e. about a month prior to the death of the said Kersi the petitioner gave birth to a son, whose custody is the subject of the present controversy.2. Respondents 1 and 2 are the father and mother respectively of the deceased Kersi. Respondent No. 3 is the maternal grand-mother of the petitioner and respondent No. 4 is the father of the petitioner. Shortly after the birth of the minor Malcolm, the petitioner and her deceased husband appear to have separated. On 21st March, 1979 the deceased Kersi left the flat at Andheri where he cohabited with the petitioner and went to reside with...
Tag this Judgment!Batliboi and Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-02-1981
Reported in: [1981]47STC321(Bom)
Sujata V. Manohar, J.1. The applicants, M/s. Batliboi & Company Pvt. Ltd., had entered into a contract with M/s. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. to sell to them a double column vertical turning and boring mill, Model SK-40A complete with standard equipment and electrical equipment, manufactured in Czechoslovakia. The applicants have an import licence for import of machinery. Prior to their contract with M/s. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd., the applicants had placed an order with the Czech manufacturers of the machine for the import of the machine in question. The applicants had also filled in a tender with the defence department under which, inter alia, they were required to supply this machine to the defence department. Thereafter by their letter dated 1st April, 1972, the applicants made an offer to M/s. Kirloskar Brothers Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'Kirloskars') offering to sell to them the same machine. In the letter of 1st April, 1972, addressed by the applicants to Kirloskars the applican...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›