Mumbai Court October 1981 Judgments
Bombay Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and 14 Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-1981
Reported in: 1992LC278(Bombay); 1982(10)ELT171(Bom)
1. The petitioners are a Private Limited Company and carry on business as manufacturers and suppliers of insecticides, pesticides and fungicides. For the purpose of manufacture of insecticides, the petitioners import into India Pyrethrum Flowers and Pyrethrum Flowers Crushed. Pyrethrum Flowers are a chemical used exclusively for their pyrethrum content which is used in the manufacture of insecticides. The petitioners entered into a large number of contracts with the Pyrethrum Marketing Board, Kenya, East Africa to import pyrethrum flowers as the same are not available in India. The petitioners had secured actual users import licenses under which the petitioners were required to use Pyrethrum Flowers and Pyrethrum Flowers Crushed only as raw materials in the manufacture of 'insecticides, pesticides and fungicides'.2. Under the Indian Tariff Act, 1934, the Pyrethrum Flowers and Pyrethrum Flowers Crushed were classified by the Customs Department for the purposes of Customs Duty as a subst...
Tag this Judgment!Raghunath S/O Gabanji Gavali and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-01-1981
Reported in: 1982(2)BomCR124
D.B. Deshpande, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of conviction and sentence recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 34/79 on his file against only accused Nos. 1 and 2 and it arises out of the following facts.2. The prosecution story is briefly as under :---There is an Industry known as Korula Rubber Factory at Aurangabad. The appellants and the other accused before the trial Court, who were four in addition to these appellants were some of the labourers employed in this industry. Mani P.W. 7 is the manager of this rubber industry and Shetty P.W. 4 is the Assistant Manager. It appears that the workers working in this factory wanted to form one union and it appears further that the workers wanted to pressurise the management to recognise their union. It appears further that it was the say of the management that they should follow the legal procedure for getting their union recognised. In view of the diversion opinion there was res...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›