Mumbai Court January 1977 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-10-1977
Reported in: [1977]39STC418(Bom)
Kania, J.1. This is a reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), made at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax. The question referred to us for our consideration is as follows : 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in the holding that the electric powered fork-lift truck sold by the respondent falls under entry 22 of Schedule E and not under entry 58 of Schedule C to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 ?' 2. The facts giving rise to this question can be very briefly stated. The respondent made an application dated 10th July, 1965, to the applicant, the Commissioner of Sales tax, under section 52 of the said Act requesting him to determine the entry under which the sale of an electric powered fork-lift truck, made by the respondent under their sale memo No. CLR 38 dated 6th January, 1965, would fall. The contention of the respondent-company was that the fork-lif...
Shankar Dhondiba Hambheer Vs. Janabai and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-10-1977
Reported in: 1978CriLJ888
ORDERShah, J.1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arises in proceedings instituted by the respondent against the petitioner who Is her husband for maintenance under the provisions of the Cr.PC2. A few facts which are material may be stated thus: The respondent No. 1 is the married wife of' the petitioner. She filed an application against the petitioner for maintenance Under Section 488 of the Cr.PC 1898 (hereinafter referred to as the 'old Code'). On Nov. 29, 1967, the Magistrate passed an order directing the petitioner to pay to the respondent maintenance at the rate of Rs. 30/- p. m. This order was obeyed by the petitioner and he made payments as directed by the court for the period up to the end of May 1971. Thereafter, the petitioner failed to pay the amount of maintenance granted to the respondent under the order of the Magistrate. She, therefore, filed an application for recovery of the arrears' of maintenance from the petitioner. The petitioner also fi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›