Mumbai Court September 1972 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Barrel and Drum Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. B.S. Kalelkar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-13-1972
Reported in: (1974)76BOMLR686
K.K. Desai, J.1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner company has challenged the legality and correctness of an interim order dated December 27, 1967, made on the interim application for disclosure and production of documents made on September 9, 1967, before the private arbitrator Shri B.S. Kalelkar in the matter of dispute referred to him under the provisions of Section 10A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for adjudicating upon claim for bonus made by the workmen of the petitioner company for the years 1961, 1962, 1963 and 1964.2. The only facts which require to be noticed are as follows:By the above application the workmen submitted that the Balance-sheets and Profit and Loss Accounts of the petitioner company that were disclosed for the above years1 did not correctly disclose the true and actual income and/or profits of the petitioner company. The submission was that the above situation had arisen because one Prakash Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd., whi...
Dhanrajmal Gobindram and Co. (P.) Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Mahar ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-12-1972
Reported in: 1973CriLJ1848
Deshpande, J.1. This appeal raises a short question to the true interpretation of Section 24 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates, Control Act, 1947, hereinafter referred to as 'the Rent Act'. There is practically no dispute about the facts. Building known as 'Calcot House' belonged once upon a time to Sir Cavasji Jahangir. It is a three storied building. The respondents hereinafter referred to as the 'complainant' have been occupying the whole of the third floor as tenant from the year 1936 on payment of monthly rent of Rs. 188.71. A lift had been installed in the building even before the complainant became the tenant. This lift stopped working with effect from 13-12-1965 by which time Sir Cavasji Jahangir had ceased to be the owner and Messrs, Onkar Investment and Properties Limited had become owners instead. The complainant called upon the said owners-Landlords to repair the lift and get the operation of the same restored. Owners seem to have pleaded their inability to...
Anusyabai Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-07-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Bom125
Padhye, J. 1. The petitioner held three fields being Khasra Nos. 32/1, 7-22/3, 31/4 and 22, total area 8.25 acres of mouza Nalwadi, tahsil and district Wardha. She desired to divert her agricultural lands into non-agricultural lands and, therefore, applied to the Sub-Divisional Officer Wardha, for diversion of the said lands.2. The Sub-Divisional Officer by his order dated 12-12-1960 granted the necessary permission for diversion. The application for diversion was presumably made under Section 156 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code which was then in force. Along with the application, the petitioner had filed the proposed layout plan showing the plots to be laid thereunder, which plan was sent to the Town Planning Officer, Nagpur, for scrutiny and opinion. The Sub-Divisional Officer, however, did not fix the premium to be paid by the petitioner on such diversion or the re-assessment of the land on account of the diversion. He left the matter of re-assessment to the Superintendent, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›