Skip to content

Mumbai Court June 1969 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 11 1969

Commissioner of Income-tax, Poona Vs. H.H. Sir C.A. Patwardhan, Rajasa ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-11-1969

Reported in: [1970]75ITR68(Bom)

Kotval, C.J.1. The assessee in this reference is the late Rajasaheb of Sangli who passed away during the pendency of these proceedings and whose heirs have been substituted. For the purpose of this reference, however, and for convenience we shall continue to refer to him as the assessee. 2. The assessment years under consideration are the year 1955-56, 1956-57 and 1957-58 relative to the account years ending June 5, 1954, June 5, 1955, and June 5, 1956. Since the point arising in this reference is the same for all the years we shall only refer to the facts pertaining to one year, namely, 1955-56, for the sake of convenience. In that year the assessee received a total income of Rs. 73,273 which was comprised of 7 items as follows : 1. Salary from Sangli Ganpati Panchayatan Sansthan Trust ... 18,0002. Property ... 25,0563. Dividends net Rs. 3,719, Gross ... 5,0434. Interest on mortgages, etc. ... 8,5015. Ground rent ... 1,2706. Cash allowance attached to Saranjam ... 1,0247. Income from ...


Jun 10 1969

Haji SharafuddIn JainudIn Vs. R.L. Pardeep

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-10-1969

Reported in: (1970)72BOMLR44; 1970MhLJ203

K.K. Desai, J.1. These two petitions by two petitioners, who were Municipal Councillors of Amalner Municipal Council, are for challenging the legality of the order dated February 15, 1969, made by the Collector, Jalgaon whereby under provisions of Section 16(7)(i) read with Section 44(7)(a) of. the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 it was ordered that the two petitioners were disqualified from continuing to be Councillors of the above Municipal Council. The order further declared that the two seats of the above two petitioners in the Municipal Council had become vacant.2. The petitioner in Special Civil Application No. 499 of 1969 was declared elected to the Municipal Council in the elections held on June 3, 1967. The petitioner in Special Civil Application No. 500 of 1969 became Councillor on August 17, 1967, by co-option,3. It appears that prior to the above two dates, one Shaikh Tayyab Shaikh Hussein was employed as a Head Master in the Primary Municipal School at Amalner. In con...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial