Mumbai Court December 1969 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rupam Pictures Vs. Chaganlal Gulabchand Chandak
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-04-1969
Reported in: (1970)72BOMLR827; 1970MhLJ260
Bhole, J.1. In all these revision applications the applicant is the same. Opponents Nos. 1 and 2 in this application and opponent No. 1 in the other two applications are different, being the plaintiffs in the three respective suits and the other opponents in all these applications are common defendants in all those suits along with the applicant and all the defendants who are partners in 'M/s Rupam Pictures, Motion Picture Distributors', the applicant. While hearing revision application No. 80 of 1969, the learned advocates on both sides requested that Civil Revision Application No. 29 as well as C.R.A. No. 24 be also heard along with C.R.A. No. 80 of 1969. After calling for the records, we found that opponents Nos. 1, 2, 8, 4 and 5 in C.R.A. No. 29 of 1960 and opponents Nos. 1, 8 and S in C.R.A. No. 24 of 1969 were served and the notices in so far as the other opponents are concerned are not yet received. A few of the opponents against whom the notices were not yet received after serv...
Laxmibai Gulabrao Vs. Martand Daulatrao Deshmukh
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-04-1969
Reported in: (1972)74BOMLR773
Bhole, J.1. This is an application for transfer by 24 out of 57 defendants against whom the plaintiffs had filed a suit in forma pauperis for possession of immoveable properties in the districts of Amravati and Akola on the ground that the transfers in question were made by the deceased Karta of the family without any legal necessity. Their case here is that opponents Nos. 1 to 6, i.e. the plaintiffs, have filed an application in the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Akola, under Order XXXIII, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, for permission to sue in forma pauperis. That application is registered in the Court as Regular Misc. Case No. 388 of 1963. They further state that the cause of action is stated in the plaint to have arisen from 1941 to 1957 at various places where the properties in suit are situated. According to them, there are in all 57 defendants out of whom 4 are reported to be dead and 37 of them are residents of Amravati district and the rest of them are from Akola di...
Laxman Bakaram Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-02-1969
Reported in: 1971CriLJ1234
Bhole, J.1. This is an appeal by the accused who was charged with an offence punishable Under Section 376, IPC as well as for an offence punishable Under Section 457, IPC but who was acquitted Under Section 376: IPC and convicted Under Section 451, IPC by the ' Sessions Judge, Bhandara.2. It is alleged that in the night between 2nd and 3rd of December, 1967, at village Khod-Shivani. the accused committed rape on one Saraswati wife of Bhura Ukey of that village. It was further alleged that at the same time and place, he committed lurking house trespass by night by entering into the house belonging to the husband of Saraswatibai.3, The accused as well as Saraswati and her husband Bhura are residents of village Khod-Shivani in Sakoli tahsil of the district Bhandara. Saraswati was living with her husband Bhura in her house in the village. She is about twenty-two years of age. Her husband was an employee and had also his own paddy fields. On the night between 2nd and 3rd of December 1967, h...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›