Mumbai Court June 1968 Judgments
N.J. Nayadu and Co. and ors. Vs. Administrator of the City of Nagpur a ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-11-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Bom59; (1969)71BOMLR253; ILR1970Bom68; 1969MhLJ234
Abhyankar, J.1. The petitioners, 18 in number, are either Managers or proprietors of cinema houses exhibiting cinema films in the City of Nagpur. There is a Corporation constituted for the City of Nagpur under the provisions of the City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation Act). Under Chapter XI in Part IV of this Act, provision is made for taxation. Under Section 114, the Legislature has provided for taxes which could be imposed under the Act by the Corporation. The procedure for imposing taxes enumerated in this section is prescribed under Section 115, Sub-section (1) of Section 114 makes provision for compulsory taxes which the Corporation must impose. Under Sub-section (2). the Corporation is empowered by the enabling provision, with the previous approval of the State Government and for the purposes of the Act, to impose some additional taxes. The additional taxes which could be so imposed are enumerated in Clauses (a) to (f), and there is a r...
Tag this Judgment!Dayawanti Bai Vs. Corporation of City of Nagpur
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-11-1968
Reported in: (1969)71BOMLR323; (1969)IILLJ128Bom; 1969MhLJ25
1. The petitioner owns a flour-mill and has obtained the necessary registration of her establishment under S. 7 of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. It appears that after the petitioner obtained the registration of establishment for purposes of running a flour-mill she installed a kadbi-cutting machine in the same premises. These premises consists of a shed and it is not disputed that both the flour-mill and the cutting machine are run by the same electric motor. An inspector appointed by the Corporation of City of Nagpur, under S. 48 of the Act, inspected the establishment of the petitioner at about 10-15 p.m. on 7 June 1966 and he found that there was no registration in respect of the kadbi-cutting business. The inspector also found that the shop was found to be open after the prescribed hours, namely, beyond 8-30 p.m. and that when certain documents which the employer is required to maintain, such as register of employment, register of leave and the visit book were aske...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›