Mumbai Court November 1960 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Servants of India Society Vs. Charity Commissioner of Bombay
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-08-1960
Reported in: AIR1962Bom12; (1961)63BOMLR379; ILR1961Bom381
Gokhale, J.(1) This appeal raises the question whether the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, applies to a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and having its objects not confined to the State of Bombay, now, so far as this case is concerned, the State of Maharashtra. The appeal has been referred to me as there has been a difference of opinion between Mr. Justice Mudholkar, as he then was, and Mr. Justice Patel.(2) The appellant is the Servants of India Society founded by the late Mr. G. K. Gokhale on 12th June 1905. It is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act (XXI of 1860), and shall hereafter be referred to as the Society. When the Bombay Public Trusts Act (XXIX of 1950), which shall hereafter be referred to as the Act, came into force, the society applied under section 18(1) of that Act registration and, in an enquiry in connection with that application held by the Assistant Charity Commissioner under section 19, contended that the provisio...
Gurusiddappa Tipanna Mugeri Vs. Miraj Education Society
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-03-1960
Reported in: (1961)63BOMLR312
Naik, J.1. The suit giving rise to this revision application was filed by opponent No. 1, Miraj Education Society, through its President, Dr. Dattatraya Shivram Bhadbhade (hereafter called the plaintiff) against the petitioner and opponent No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as defendants Nos. 1 and 2 respectively) for a declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000 kept in fixed deposit by the deceased, Tippanna Satappa Mugeri in the Belgaum Bank. Defendant No. 1 is the son and defendant No. 2 is the widow of the deceased. The material facts may be briefly stated as follows: The deceased, Tippanna Satappa Mugeri had kept a sum of Rs. 15,000 in the Miraj Branch of the Belgaum Bank on July 9, 1956, and another sum of Rs. 10,000 on May 7, 1956, in the Jayasingpur Branch of the said Bank, as fixed deposits. The period of these fixed deposits was for one year. Tippanna was ailing and was taking treatment in a hospital at Miraj under the guidance of one Dr. Gosavi. On...
Standard Drum and Barrel Manufacturing Company, Bombay Vs. Its Workmen ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-02-1960
Reported in: (1961)ILLJ130Bom
Acts/Rules/Orders: Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1), 10(2), 12(5), 19(2) and 33AAWARD 1. This industrial dispute was referred to me under S. 10(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, under No. AJS/14/60, dated 29 April, 1960, of the office of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Administration), Bombay. The demands of the workmen are as follows :- Demand 1 - Permanency. - The total complement of workmen on temporary rolls in each department should not at any time exceed 10 per cent of the average of the total number of workmen (including permanent) during the preceding year. Such exceeding number of temporary workmen should be made permanent immediately form time to time. Demand 2 - Compensation for weekly off days and other holidays. - Every workmen who has to work on weekly off day or any holiday should get compensation at the rate of double the total wages, in addition to statutory compensatory holiday. Demand 3 - Uniforms. - Watchmen, welders, painters, fitters, tur...
Filmistan (Private) Ltd., Bombay Vs. Its Workmen
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-01-1960
Reported in: (1961)ILLJ138Bom
Acts/Rules/Orders: Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 12(5) and 25HAWARD1. The industrial dispute was referred to me under S. 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, by Labour and Social Welfare Department Order No. AJF 2559-H, dated 30 April 1960. The demand of the workmen is : 'Sri H. D. Potdar should be paid compensation equivalent to Rs. 227.50 nP. being the amount of wages he has lost on account of the company's failure to call him for work when there was new recruitment on 18 April 1959.' 2. The facts of the case are as follows : Sri Potdar had been employed by the Filmistan (Private), Ltd., first in the year 1951 on a salary of Rs. 115 plus dearness allowance of Rs. 35. In July 1952 his services were terminated. He was taken up again as a moulder on 7 February, 1955 on a salary of Rs. 90 plus dearness allowance of Rs. 35. On 3 September, 1957 the company effected retrenchment of its staff in the moulding department. Consequently, Sir Potdar came to be retrenched. On...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›