Mumbai Court August 1958 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naik N.M. Vs. Colaba Land Mills
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-05-1958
Reported in: (1959)61BOMLR456; (1960)ILLJ448Bom
Tambe, J. 1. This is an application under Art. 227 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioners pray for quashing the orders made on 6 February, 1958, by the industrial court, Bombay (opponent 3 herein), dismissing the petitioners' appeal, as well as for setting aside the order made by the labour court on 11 December, 1957. 2. The facts and circumstances giving rise to this petition, in brief, are : The petitioners claim to be working as foremen in the Colaba Land Mills, opponent 1 hereto (hereinafter referred to as 'the mills'). They say that there was an award made by the industrial court on 26 May, 1956, in the matter of payscales for the technical and supervisory staff in the cotton textile mills in Bombay. The parties to this award were Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh reprinting the employees in the textile mills of Bombay (hereinafter referred to as 'the sangh') and the Millowners' Association, Bombay, representing the millowners. According to the petitioners, this award is ...
R.S. Rekhchand Mohta Spg. and Wvg. Mills (Private) Ltd. Vs. Commission ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-04-1958
Reported in: (1959)61BOMLR90; [1959]10STC229(Bom)
Gokhale, J.1. The assessee in both these civil references had submitted his returns under the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 (XXI of 1947), for two years covering the period between 22nd October, 1949, to 9th November, 1950, and 10th November, 1950, to 30th October, 1951, and he was assessed by the Regional Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Amravati, by his orders dated 18th August, 1953, in respect of both the periods. The amounts of assessments were paid by the assessee in pursuance of those orders. Thereafter, notices were issued by the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Nagpur, under section 22-B of the C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act calling upon the assessee to show cause why the assessment orders passed by the Regional Assistant Commissioner, Amravati, should not be set aside. In reply to the said notices, the applicant filed written objections contending inter alia that section 22-B which came into force on 1st December, 1953, by virtue of Act No. XX of 1953, could not...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›