Mumbai Court March 1958 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deoraj Divanchand Verma Vs. the State
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-07-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Bom509; 1959CriLJ1307
ORDER1. The applicant has been convicted for breaches of rule 11, Sub-rules (1), (2) and (3), the Central Provinces Shops and Establishments Rules, 1947, read with Rule 14 thereof, which imposes a fine which may extend to Rs. 50/- for contravention of any of the provisions of Rule 11. The offences alleged to have been committed under the Sub-rules mentioned above by the applicant are (1) that he did not maintain a register of employees in form C appended to the Rules, (2) that he did not exhibit in his establishment a notice in form D specifying the daily hours of work and intervals for rest and meals to be allowed to persons employed, and (c) that he did not exhibit in his establishment a notice in form D specifying the daily hours of work and intervals for rest and meals to be allowed to persons employed, and (c) that he did not exhibit in his establishment any notice in form E specifying the day or days of the week on which the persons employed by him shall be given a holiday. Thoug...
Sadasheo Jagannath Barapatre Vs. Hemaji Hiraman Bakde
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-05-1958
Reported in: AIR1958Bom507; (1959)61BOMLR1141; ILR1958Bom1361
ORDER1. This is an application for revision under Section 20-A (5) of the Central Provinces and Berar Municipalities Act and it raises a somewhat interesting and important question as to the construction, and effect of Section 74(2) of the Representation of the People (Second Amendment) Act (Central Act 27 of 1956).2. The question arises in the following circumstances. The applicant Sadasheo Jagannath Barapatre had at one time stood for election to the former Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly and had been disqualified under the then existing provisions of Section 143 read with Section 7, Clause (c), of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (Act 43 of 1951). The notification (No. 69-4-53), dated 1-9-1953 issued in this behalf by the Election Commission of India was published in the then Madhya Pradesh Gazette of 10-9-1953. The disqualification mentioned in the notification under the said sections read with Rule 114, Sub-rule (5) of the Representation of the People Rules, 1951 was...
Pandurang Laxman Parab Vs. State of Bombay
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-04-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Bom30; (1958)60BOMLR811; 1959CriLJ34; ILR1959Bom243
Datar, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the accused who has been convicted for an offence under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 4 of the prevention of Corruption act and sentenced to undergo six months' rigorous imprisonment.2. The case of the prosecution was that the accused was at the material time a watchman or a mukaddam in the employ of the Bombay Port Trust. The complainant, one Gulabrao Jagdale, is a driver of a bullock cart which belongs to his master, one Govind Mali. He used to stay in the Lokhandi Jatha, an area which belongs to the Bombay Port Trust. It appears that he has his family which consists of three members at Satara. The complainant use dot drive the bullock cart on hire and every day he sue dot give an account of the earnings which he made by driving the bullock cart. The accused told the complainant not to keep the bullock cart in the Lokhandi Jatha. He told that if the compliant did not give an amount of Rs. 10 per month as bribe, he wold m...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›