Mumbai Court December 1958 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Brindalal and anr. Vs. Gokal and Haflman Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-04-1958
Reported in: (1959)61BOMLR996
(1) The point for consideration concerns court-fees. This plaint was presented to the Prothonotary of this Court. the plaint has been made out on papers which bear court-fee stamps of the aggregate value of Rs. 2,360/-. These court-fee stamps bear the imprint thereon 'Delhi'. This plaint was originally filed in the Court of the Senior Subordinate Judge, Delhi, and after certain proceedings in Delhi the same was returned to the plaintiffs for being presented to the proper Court on the ground that that Court had no jurisdiction to entertain and try the suit. Under those circumstances this plaint was thereafter presented in the office of the Prothonotary and the office raised a contention that the plaint could not be accepted and filed in this Court unless proper court-fee had been paid to the office which payment would be made to the office on behalf of the State of Bombay. The only question for determination, therefore , is whether, even on the assumption that the amount of the court-fe...
State Vs. Pundlik Bhikaji Ahire and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-04-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Bom543; (1959)61BOMLR837; 1959CriLJ1421
Shah, J.1. Pundlik Bhikaji Ahire, whom we will hereafter refer to as the first accused and Fajitrao Damu Mahale, whom we will hereafter refer to as the second accused, were tried by the Special Judge, Ahmednagar, in Corruption Case No. 1 of 1958, for offences respectively under Sections 161 and 165A of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Special Judge acquitted the two accused, and against the order of acquittal this appeal has been preferred by the State of Bombay.2. The material facts which give raise to the prosecution may be briefly stated. Chapter proceedings were started by the Police against one Mohanlal Doshi in the Court of the Executive Magistrate at Sangamner. The proceedings was then transferred to the Court of the Special Executive Magistrate at Ahmednagar. The first accused was the Presiding Officer of the Court of the Special Executive Magistrate at Ahmednagar. The second accused is the son-in-law of the first accused and was employed in the police force as a constable. H...
Bhawalkhan Zelanikhan Vs. B.C. Shah
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-03-1958
Reported in: (1959)61BOMLR993
(1) This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of an order dated November 1st, 1958 made by the respondent in pursnance of Clause 11 of the Foreigners Order, 1948. The relevant facts are as follows:(2) The petitioner is a foreigner and is a national fo Afghanistan. By an order dated June 3rd, 1957 made by the Dy. Secretary to the Government of India in exedrcise o the powers conferred by the sub-section (2) of section 3 of the Foreigners Act it was directed that the petitioenr shall not remain in India and that he shall depart from India by landroute and thereafter shall not re-enter India. According to the respondent the petitioner has been involved in six criminal cases a list whereof is enclosed as Ex. 1 to the affidavit in reply. The petitoner has never denied the binding character of the order of deportation dated June 3rd, 1957. The Government however has not been able to deport the petitioner from out of India because the petitioner has to go ...
Surendra Shankar Walkar Vs. Laxman Shankar Waikar and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-02-1958
Reported in: (1959)61BOMLR757
ORDER1. The relevant facts out of which this civil revision application and the civil application arise are briefly as follows. The applicant and opponent No. 1 are brothers. Opponents Nos. 2 and 3 are the sons of opponent No. 1. There were certain disputes between the applicant on the one hand and the opponents on the other with regard to joint family properties, which were referred to arbitration. During the pendency of the arbitration proceedings, the applicant made an application for grant of a succession certificate in order to enable him to withdraw a sum of Rs. 31,000 which was lying with some banks in Ahmednagar to the credit of the father of the applicant and opponent No. 1 who died on 24-5-1954.That application was granted and the succession certificate was issued in favour of the applicant. After obtaining the aforesaid succession certificate, the applicant withdrew the aforesaid amount of Rs. 31,000 from the banks after furnishing security as ordered by the Court which gran...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›