Mumbai Court January 1958 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
institute Indo-portuguese and ors. Vs. theotonio Borges and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-07-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Bom275; (1958)60BOMLR660; ILR1958Bom1055
1. There is, in the City of Bombay, a Public Trust established and administered in the name of Institute:Indo-Portuguese. This institution is a juridical body created in the City under the Legislative Diploma No. 1066 dated 31-8-1939, issued by the governor-General of Portuguese India in the exercise of the powers conferred upon him by Articles 28 and 30 of the colonial Act and by Article 43 of the Ordinance of the Portuguese Colonial Empire. The object for which this institute appears to have been created is 'to give assistance and protection to the Indo-Portuguese emigrants, we are residents in British India, by inciting them to a patriotic ideal, civil conscience and feeling of national solidarity'. Under the Legislative Diploma aforesaid, the institution is to be managed by a Managing Committee consisting of a President and four members, who are to be appointed every three years by the Governor-General from among the Portuguese citizens residing in this city. It is also stated that...
Major General Shanta Shamsher Jung Bahadur Rana Vs. Kamani Brothers Pr ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-06-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Bom201; (1958)60BOMLR1024; [1959]29CompCas501(Bom)
1. This is a suit filed by the plaintiff, who admittedly was one of the joint managing directors and a director of the first defendant company, against the first defendant company and his co-directors for a declaration that the resolution dated 23rd September, 1957 passed by the Board of directors of the first defendant company is inoperative and that the plaintiff continues to be the joint managing director and is entitled to act as such managing director and to exercise all rights and powers to carry out all duties assigned to him as such managing director.2. The facts relevant to the decision of the disputes herein are not in dispute, with the result that no oral evidence whatever has been ld. The only evidence led is documentary evidence, the same being relevant and necessary for the purpose of the decision herein. It is therefore not necessary to set out the contentions as contained in the pleading of the parties. It will suffice to set out the facts which give rise to the dispute...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›