Skip to content

Mumbai Court March 1955 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 01 1955

Dhanji Girja Bhailume and ors. Vs. Dharma Kanhu and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-01-1955

Reported in: AIR1956Bom204

Gajendragadkar, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs and it arises from their suit in which they claimed to recover their share in the property in suit by equitable partition. According to the plaintiffs, they were entitled to two annas share in the suit property which is Maharki Watan in the village of Karjat. In this village there are three Takshims and the plaintiffs and the defendants belong to the first Takshim of Bahilurae.The two other Takshims are Kadam Takshim and Sat-Samindar Takshim. The Bahilume Takshim is entitled to eight annas share in the watan whereas the two remaining Takshims are entitled to six annas and two annas respectively.2. The plaintiffs allege that In 1949 the Collector of Ahmednagar had entered the name of their branch amongst the sharers of the Bahilume Takshim and the entry showed that the plaintiffs' branch was entitled to two annas share in the said watan. It is substantially by virtue of this entry that the plaintiffs brought the present suit to re...


Mar 01 1955

C.T. Daru and ors. Vs. Manager, Ahmedabad Spinning and Manufacturing C ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-01-1955

Reported in: AIR1955Bom460; (1955)57BOMLR887; ILR1955Bom815

Chagla, C.J.1. 168 employees of the Ahmedabad Spinning and ., which is represented by its manager as opponent No. 1, filed an application before the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act alleging that wages were due to them from 29-12-1953 to 10-1-1954, amounting in all to Rs. 114. The contention of the employees was that they were each attending (sic) four looms in the mills, that they had been paid on a certain basis and that their wages had been illegally reduced by the mills and their proper wages had not been paid to them.The Authority gave a direction to the (sic) to pay the amount claimed. The mills went in (sic) peal to the District Court and the learned Extra Assistant Judge at Ahmedabad has reversed the decision of the Authority and the employees through the General Secretary of the Mill Mazdoor Mandal of which they are members, have come on this petition challenging that decision.2. Now, it appears that an award was made in 1948 in a dispute between the Ahmedabad Millowne...



AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial