Mumbai Court October 1947 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
William Roger Fernandez and ors. Vs. Emperor.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-07-1947
Reported in: 1949CriLJ335
ORDERPadhye, J.1. The accused, William (who is now reported to have died) was the owner of survey No. 75 of mauza Umri. Over a portion of the field is a kotha which belonged and is in the possession of the complainant's mother. On the ground that the complainant's bullocks did damage to the field of. the accused, the bullocks were seized and sent to the cattle pound on 24th March 1946.2. On 2nd April 1946, the complainant filed a complaint in the Court of the Magistrate under Section 20, Cattle Trespass Act. This com-plaint wag registered and enquired into by the Magistrate who convicted William and also his servant Sk. Rasul for having 'seized a pair of bullocks and impounded it in contravention of the Cattle Trespass Act. The learned Magistrate-convicted be to the accused and sentenced William to a fine of Es. 25 and Sk. Rasul to Es. 15. Out of these fines Es. 12 were to be paid to the complainant as compensation under Section 545 (1)(a), Criminal P. C. be to William and his servant ...
Bhagwandas Ranchoddas Modi Vs. Natwarlal Maganlal Mehta
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-06-1947
Reported in: (1949)51BOMLR471
Desai, J.1. The plaintiffs have brought this suit against the defendant for an order that the defendant may be directed and ordered to render a true and complete account of his management of the trusts referred to in the plaint and of the trust securities and proceeds thereof and interest of the securities and all other trust monies on the footing that the defendant is guilty of misappropriating the funds belonging to the said trusts. That is prayer (a) of the plaint. Prayers (b), (c) and (d) are ancillary to that prayer. Prayers (e), (f) and (g) refer to interim reliefs. Prayer (h) is in these terms:That the amount due and payable by the defendant to the plaintiffs as trustees with interest may be ascertained and declared and that the defendant may be ordered to pay to the plaintiffs such sum as may be found due, and to make good to the plaintiffs all sums and the value of securities misapplied or appropriated by him.' Prayer (i) says that the defendant may be removed from his office ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›