Mumbai Nagpur Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramkisan and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretar ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Nov-23-2016
Oral Judgment: (B.R. Gavai, J.) 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent. 2. The petitioners have approached this Court being aggrieved by communication dt.31.3.2015 issued by respondent no.4 directing the petitioners to furnish the resolution of Gram Sabha thereby resolving to grant No Objection for renewal of petitioners' licences. The petitioners have prayed for a declaration that the provisions under Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Panchayat Extension to Scheduled Area (Prohibition and Regulation of Licensing) Rules, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules of 2015") are not applicable for renewal of the licenses which are in existence prior to the coming into force of the said Rules. 3. All the petitioners are holding country liquor CL-III/FL-II licenses in Ghatanji taluka, District Yavatmal. Undisputedly, the petitioners are running their business in the areas which fall under the Scheduled Areas declared for the State of Maharashtra by the President under Articl...
Narendra Vs. Bank of Baroda, through its Deputy Generala Manager, (Mah ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
Oral Judgment: (V.M. Deshpande, J.) 1. By the present petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 14.01.2004 passed by the disciplinary authority imposing penalty of removal from service upon the petitioner together with the order passed by the appellate authority dated 17.03.2005 by which the appeal preferred by the petitioner came to be rejected. 2. The facts giving rise to the present petition in nutshell are as under: FACTS: The petitioner initially was appointed as Clerk-cum-Cashier on 24.01.1975 with the Bank of Baroda. He was promoted as Officer in the year 1987. He was further promoted in the pay scale of MM-II in the year 1995. In the year 1998, the petitioner was transferred to Old Cotton Market, Akola branch of Bank of Baroda. The misconduct, which the petitioner committed, relates to this branch when he was discharging his duties in the managerial capacity with said branch. The petitioner was suspended from service on 11.07.2001. On 15.04.2002, the respondent no...
Devidas and Others Vs. Gangubai, (deceased), through his legal heirs : ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Nov-16-2016
Oral Judgment: 1. Rule, made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsels appearing for the parties. 2. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 25-2-2014 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, in Revision No.175/TENB/2000, rejecting the application for condonation of delay of 2 years and 8 months caused in filing an application for bringing the names of legal representatives of the original non-applicant Smt. Gangubai Shridhar Kulkarni on record. The order also rejects the application for condonation of delay of 98 days caused in filing an application for bringing the name of the legal representative Umakant, one of the legal representatives of Smt. Gangubai. 3. The petitioners have preferred Revision No.175/TENB/2000 under Section 111 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958 against the order dated 16-10-1999 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Akot, in Appeal No.TNC107/Kapsi/10/1998-99 pertaining to field Survey No.21/2...
Dipak son of Chandrasing Kolhekar, Convict No. C-4630 Vs. The State of ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Nov-15-2016
S.B. Shukre, J. 1. This is an appeal preferred against the judgment and order delivered on 26.11.2014 in Sessions Trial No. 20 of 2012 by the Additional Sessions Judge-I, Achalpur, thereby convicting and sentencing the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are as under: This is a case wherein a 2-Year old marriage between the appellant and the deceased Ratna met with an abrupt and unfortunate end due to indiscretion shown by the appellant, which proved to be fatal for his wife. The couple was residing at village Diya, Tahsil Dharni, District Amravati together with their 9-month old son. The appellant, it is alleged, had the habit of consuming liquor and returning home intoxicated. It is further alleged that in the state of intoxication, the appellant used to suspect the fidelity of his wife, deceased Ratna, and sometimes, even beat her. Evening of 29.4.2011, however, was different for the couple, in the...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›