Mumbai Nagpur Court July 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Tulsabai Wd/O Motiramji Tidke, Dead Through Lrs. and Others Vs. S ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
1. This is an appeal under section 72 (4) of the Bombay Public Trust Act (for short “Act of 1950”) taking an exception to the judgment and order dated 12/8/1996 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Nagpur in M.C.A. No.519/1990 thereby confirming the order dated 1/9/1990 passed by the learned Joint Charity Commissioner in Appeal No.72/1993. 2. The facts are thus: One Adkuji Palandurkar owned the house bearing No.866, Ward No.29, Circle No.17/23 at Nagpur. He died leaving behind him widow Manabai, son Shivram and two daughters namely Kasabai and Sarswatibai. Shivram died issue less in the year 1941. Manabai died in the year 1952. Kasabai died in the year 1959 and left behind her son Motiram who died in March 1972 and daughter Sakhubai. Tulsabai is the widow of Motiram. Saraswatibai died in the year 1972 leaving behind her son Rajaram who also died in the year 1972. For better appreciation, the concerned genealogical tree is reproduced below: TABLE 3. Controversy i...
Smt. Tulsabai Wd/O Motiramji Tidke, Dead Through Lrs. and Others Vs. S ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
1. This is an appeal under section 72 (4) of the Bombay Public Trust Act (for short Act of 1950) taking an exception to the judgment and order dated 12/8/1996 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Nagpur in M.C.A. No.519/1990 thereby confirming the order dated 1/9/1990 passed by the learned Joint Charity Commissioner in Appeal No.72/1993. 2. The facts are thus: One Adkuji Palandurkar owned the house bearing No.866, Ward No.29, Circle No.17/23 at Nagpur. He died leaving behind him widow Manabai, son Shivram and two daughters namely Kasabai and Sarswatibai. Shivram died issue less in the year 1941. Manabai died in the year 1952. Kasabai died in the year 1959 and left behind her son Motiram who died in March 1972 and daughter Sakhubai. Tulsabai is the widow of Motiram. Saraswatibai died in the year 1972 leaving behind her son Rajaram who also died in the year 1972. For better appreciation, the concerned genealogical tree is reproduced below: TABLE 3. Controversy is in respect o...
Ravikant Lakshminarayan Zanwar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
Oral Judgment: (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) Rule. In view of the order passed on 01.03.2012 and by consent of the parties, we proceed to hear and dispose of the petition at the stage of admission. 2. This is a Writ Petition by a person claiming to be owner of Survey No.120, Sub-division No.1A, 2 and 3, admeasuring 2 H. 47 R of Mouza Rahatgaon, District Amravati. This land is within the municipal limits of the Amravati Municipal Corporation. This land was reserved for play ground and for primary school. 3. The respondent no.2 is the Planning Authority and the petitioner has stated that the reservation in terms of the above public purpose was sanctioned w.e.f. 25.02.1993, however, as no steps were taken for acquisition of the petitioner's land either by way of an agreement or by resorting to the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 a notice came to be served calling upon the Planning Authority to take requisite steps in terms of Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning A...
Mrs. Ratnaprabha W/O. Dr.Ramakant Nilkanthrao Ghuge (Pangrekar) Vs. St ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jul-18-2012
P.C. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State. Perused the application, reply filed by the State and rejoinders filed by the applicant as also documents filed below Criminal Application No.709 of 2012. 2. Applicant is seeking pre-arrest bail in Crime No.2/12 registered with Police Station, Malegaon District Washim for the offences punishable under Section 302, 201, 435, 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 5 and 25 of the Arms Act. 3. Applicant had moved before the Sessions Judge, Washim vide Misc. Criminal Application 284 of 2012 in which she had prayed for interim anticipatory bail also. That prayer was rejected and, therefore, applicant filed Criminal Application (ABA) No.204 of 2012 before this Court. This Court (brother M.N.Gilani, J) on observing that main application was still pending, did not entertain the application and expected the learned Sessions Judge to decide the application of the applicant fi...
Arun S/O Balkrishna Bhoyar Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jul-17-2012
Oral Judgment: The Appellant has challenged the validity and legality of the Judgment and Order dated 21st July, 1998 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 1995, whereby the appellant (accused) was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and he was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of which to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months. By the impugned Judgment and Order, the appellant (accused) was however acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Facts briefly stated are as under:- Deceased Renukabai, who was sister of first informant namely; Manohar Khedikar, had married with appellant (accused) on 30/05/1994, and was residing with her husband. It is the case of prosecution that at the time of marriage, a sum of Rs. 2,000/-, gold ring and a wrist watch were given to the appellant (accused). At th...
Smt. Vimlabai W/O Janardan Mahure and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jul-17-2012
Oral Judgment: (A.B. Chaudhari, J.) This Intra Court Appeal is directed at the instance of the non-tribal transferees against the judgment and order dated 23.08.2002 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.349/1992. SUBMISSIONS 2. In support of the appeal, Mr. Bhuibhar, the learned counsel for the non-tribal transferees, vehemently argued that the proceedings for restoration of land were initiated at the instance of the tribal transferor under Section 36 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, which was subsequently heard and decided by the Competent Authority i.e. Tahsildar. The said lis was between the same parties. That being so, according to the learned counsel for the appellants, the instant proceeding, registered suo motu by Collector under the provisions of Section 3 of the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974, is clearly hit by the principles of Res Judicata as the issue was decided between the same parties. It is further contended on beha...
Arun S/O Balkrishna Bhoyar Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jul-17-2012
Oral Judgment: The Appellant has challenged the validity and legality of the Judgment and Order dated 21st July, 1998 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 1995, whereby the appellant (accused) was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and he was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of which to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months. By the impugned Judgment and Order, the appellant (accused) was however acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Facts briefly stated are as under:- Deceased Renukabai, who was sister of first informant namely; Manohar Khedikar, had married with appellant (accused) on 30/05/1994, and was residing with her husband. It is the case of prosecution that at the time of marriage, a sum of Rs. 2,000/-, gold ring and a wrist watch were given to the appellant (accused). At th...
Ashok Pundlik Wajge Vs. Manohar Son of Sitaram Ingle and Another
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
Oral Judgment: 1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order 25.5.1998 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, FC, Achalpur in Regular Criminal Case No. 101 of 1987 acquitting the respondents of the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and thereby dismissing complaint of the appellant, appellant has filed present appeal. 2. Originally, the complaint was filed against one P. Patra, Managing Director; M. Chakravarti, Director of Busy Land Development Corporation, Midnapur (WB) and present respondents who are said to be respectively the Manager and Divisional Manager of the said Corporation. However, during the pendency of complaint, appellant/complainant deleted the names of P. Patra and M. Chakravarti (original accused nos. 1 and 2) from the array of parties. Thus, the complaint was prosecuted only against present respondents. 3. One Busy Land Development Corporation opened its office Paratwada. They floated two schemes - one of accepting recurring d...
Wamanrao S/O Bakaramji Pawar, (Since Deceased), Through His Legal Heir ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
This Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 21/11/1997, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in a Special Case No. 3 of 1989, whereby the original accused Wamanrao Bakaramji Pawar, Head Constable, B. No. 755 was convicted of offence punishable under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month on each count and fine in the sum of Rs. 500/- for offence punishable under Section 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and in default of fine amount, he was directed to suffer simple imprisonment for two weeks. Substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. 2. Heard submissions at the bar. 3. Facts, in nutshell, as under: - On 14/05/1987 at about 10.00 a.m., quarrel had taken place between Wasudeo Hande (PW3) and one Arun Shembe. Mr. Arun Shembe and his brother namely Sudhakar Shembe had beaten up Mr. Wasudeo (PW3) by cycle chain and in...
State of Maharashtra, Through Central Bureau of Investigation, Special ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jul-16-2012
1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dt.19.9.1997 passed in Special Case No.16 of 1992 by the learned Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Nagpur whereby the respondent/accused Padmakar Dandekar was acquitted of the offences punishable under Section 120-B r/w. Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and u/s. 5(i)(d), 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. 2. Heard the submissions at the Bar. 3. Original accused no.2 Manohar G. Meshram had expired during pendency of the Special Case and the case had abated as against him. 4. The facts, briefly stated are thus: That the complainant Javherchand Shankarlal Sonar was serving as an Examiner in the (Inspectorate of Armaments) Directorate of Arms from 2.11.1982. In the year 1982, he was prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court No.3, Kalyan, District Thane. He was convicted by the trial Magistrate. In an appeal in the Ses...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »