Mumbai Nagpur Court May 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.B. Shreeram Religious and Charitable Trust and ors. Vs. the Nagpur I ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: May-06-2011
1. Heard. 2. Admit. 3. Taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned Counsel for the rival parties. 4. Being aggrieved by the order dated 20.1.2011, passed by the 3rd Jt. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur, below Exh.5, in Special Civil Suit No.1186/2010, rejecting the said application for grant of temporary injunction, the present appeal against order has been filed by the original plaintiffs- appellants herein. FACTS : 5. The appellants are the original plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No.1186/2010 for declaration, permanent injunction and damages in which they filed application (Exh.5) for grant of temporary injunction pending decision of the suit. In the suit, they have prayed for a decree to declare order dated 30.9.2010 passed by defendant No.2 Chairman of defendant No.1 Nagpur Improvement Trust (for short, hereinafter referred to as the N.I.T. ) as illegal, mala fide and in collusion with defendant No.4 Corporator of Nagpur Municipal Corporation (for short, herei...
Dhanusingh S/O Bhivsingh Naik Anjd ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra a ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: May-06-2011
1) Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of Shri Mirza, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri Fulzele, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent no.1, Shri Tajne, learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 4, and Shri Padhye, Advocate for the respondent no.3. 2) Shri Mirza, learned Counsel for the petitioners, has submitted that the petitioners are elected members of respondent no.2 Panchayat Samiti, Mahagaon and respondent no.3 is Chairman thereof. The grievance of the petitioners is against the communication dated 23/12/2010 issued by the respondent no.2 Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Mahagaon whereby Collector, Yavatmal was informed that resignations tendered by the petitioners as members of the Panchayat Samiti have been accepted by the Chairman of Panchayat Samiti and, therefore, their posts fell vacant, hence, appropriate steps to fill up vacancies according to law should be taken. It is submitted that acceptance of resignations...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›