Mumbai Nagpur Court November 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Aurangabad Zilha Krushi and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Nov-29-2011
ORAL JUDGEMENT (PER : B.R. GAVAI, J.) : 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally, by consent. 2. The petitioner had initially approached this Court for a direction in the nature of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to withdraw the Public Tender Notice, published in Daily Sakal, Aurangabad dated 27th May, 2011, for the property bearing CTS No. 9233, admeasuring 685.75 sq. mtr. and 963.80 sq. mtr., situated at Jinsi Market Yard, Aurangabad, owned and possessed by the Respondent No. 5 Society, which is under liquidation. 3. This Court, vide order dated 17th June, 2011, had issued notice before admission. The matter was thereafter listed before this Court (i.e. the Bench consisting of Hon'ble Shri Justice D.B. Bhosale and Hon'ble Shri Justice S.B. Deshmukh) on 15th July, 2011. It appears from record that when the matter was heard on 15th July, 2011, a statement was made on behalf of respondent No. 6 - M/s Abbas Transport Company that their offer of Rs. 73 lakhs...
Sadiq Colony, Barshitakli, District Akola Vs. Smt Shabana Anjum Dought ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Nov-28-2011
Oral Judgment 1. By this application, revision petitioner (husband) challenged legality, propriety and correctness of the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati on 23.1.2004 in Criminal Revision No. 10 of 2003 whereby the revision application was allowed and the respondent- wife was granted monthly maintenance of Rs. 750/- from the date of application plus costs of Rs. 250/- for the proceedings. Earlier, learned trial Magistrate who heard an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Misc. Criminal Application No. 231 of 2002, claim of respondent-wife for maintenance for herself was rejected. However, claim for maintenance for child was granted in the sum of Rs. 350/- per month from the date of application plus Rs. 1500/- towards costs of the proceedings. Aggrieved by refusal to grant maintenance to wife, wife had challenged refusal to grant maintenance in Criminal Revision No. 10 of 2003 which was decided by the impugned judgment a...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›