Mumbai Goa Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State (Through Public Prosecutor) Vs. Abdul Karim Hodur
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Feb-05-2014
The appeal is filed against the judgment and order of Criminal Appeal No. 76 of 2010 which was pending before the Assistant Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji. Sessions Court has acquitted the respondent of the offences punishable under Section 279, 304-A of I.P.C. The respondent was convicted and sentenced for these offences by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ponda in Criminal Case no.11/S/2009/C. 2. Both the sides are heard. 3. In short, the facts leading to the institution of the appeal can be stated as follows:- The accident took place on 3.6.2008 at about 18.10 hours near Vijay Shaw Mills situated at Bhoma, Banastari -Ponda road. The truck bearing No. GA-01-W-6555 was being driven by the respondent and he was proceeding towards Ponda. The scooter of the complainant was also proceeding towards Ponda side. The accident took place when the scooter was ahead of the truck. It is the allegation of the rider of the scooter, the complainant that the dash was given to his scoot...
Antonio Tiago D'Costa, (Deceased) and Others Vs. the Union of India, T ...
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Feb-03-2014
The appeal is filed against the Judgment and decree of Special Civil Suit No.167/00/I which was pending in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Margao. The suit was filed for making correction in the Revenue record of some suit lands and for compensation in respect of damage caused to those lands. The suit is dismissed in respect of these lands by the trial court and that part of the decision is challenged in the appeal. 2. In the appeal learned counsel for the appellant and respondent Telephone department is heard. The other respondents did not turn up. 3. In short, the facts leading to the institution of the appeal, can be stated as under: It is the case of the appellants/plaintiffs that they and defendant no.9 are the owners of land bearing survey nos. 149/13, 154/1, 154/2, 155/2, and 156/1,156/2,156/3,156/4,156/5, situated at village Guirdolim Salcete. It is the case of the plaintiffs that all the survey numbers are together known as œMolla?. The boundaries of the prope...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›