Mumbai Goa Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G.N. Gawade Vs. State of Goa (Through Chief Secretary) and Others
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Sep-03-2012
U.V. Bakre, J. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Counsel for the respondents waive notice. By consent, heard finally forthwith. 2. By this Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 12/3/2012, passed by the State Police Complaints Authority, Altinho, Panaji-Goa, as against the petitioner and also the Charge Memorandum bearing No. DE-16/2012/6747/2012 dated 31/7/2012 issued by the Office of Director General of Police, Goa, pursuant to the impugned order dated 12/3/2012 passed by the State Police Complaints Authority. 3. The Respondent no. 3 had filed a complaint dated 06/08/2007 to State Police Complaints Authority (S.P.C.A.). alleging that on 8/7/2005 when he had questioned one Ramanand Chodankar about the cutting of bhendi tree by him from the property of respondent no. 3, said Ramanand came and assaulted him with a koita on his left forearm as result of which he suffered injuries. It was further al...
G.N. Gawade Vs. State of Goa (Through Chief Secretary) and Others
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Sep-03-2012
U.V. Bakre, J. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Counsel for the respondents waive notice. By consent, heard finally forthwith. 2. By this Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 12/3/2012, passed by the State Police Complaints Authority, Altinho, Panaji-Goa, as against the petitioner and also the Charge Memorandum bearing No. DE-16/2012/6747/2012 dated 31/7/2012 issued by the Office of Director General of Police, Goa, pursuant to the impugned order dated 12/3/2012 passed by the State Police Complaints Authority. 3. The Respondent no. 3 had filed a complaint dated 06/08/2007 to State Police Complaints Authority (S.P.C.A.). alleging that on 8/7/2005 when he had questioned one Ramanand Chodankar about the cutting of bhendi tree by him from the property of respondent no. 3, said Ramanand came and assaulted him with a koita on his left forearm as result of which he suffered injuries. It was further al...
Raul Prazeres Vs. State of Goa, Through the Chief Secretary and Others
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Sep-03-2012
Oral Judgment: Heard Shri Sudesh Usgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri S. Narvekar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents no.1 and 2, Shri D. Pangam, learned Counsel appearing for respondent no.3 and Shri M.B. Da Costa, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the intervenor. 2. The above petition challenges an order passed by the respondent no.2 dated 9/12/2005 whereby the petitioner was directed to demolish the disputed structures in the property surveyed under no.266/2 of Mandrem village. 3. Briefly, the facts of the case as stated by the petitioner are that the respondent no.3 on 10/08/1992 issued a permission to the predecessor in title of the petitioner for reconstruction of the existing old house bearing no.435, 435/4, 435/5 and 435/6 in the property surveyed under no.266/2 at Mandrem village. On 5/01/1993, the respondent no.3 issued a reconstruction permission to the said predecessor in title for reconstruction of the existing old ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›